Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Benjamin C. Esty, Carrie Ferman, Frank J. Lysy. The Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version (referred as “Cobban Sugar” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Emerging markets, Financial analysis, Government, Project management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version Case Study

In September 1998, Paul Cooper, Tate & Lyle's finance director for international investments, asked the International Finance Corp. (IFC) to consider lending up to $45 million to finance a $90 million sugar mill in northern Vietnam. Ewen Cobban, an IFC agricultural specialist, was in charge of reviewing the proposal and making a loan recommendation to senior management. Cobban's main concerns were whether the plant was commercially viable and whether it had support from the government. He also feared that world sugar prices were falling and that sugar was a protected commodity. Before he could recommend approval, he had to determine whether they were temporary or permanent problems. Cobban also knew he would have to assess the project's developmental impact. The IFC only supported projects that contributed to sustainable development, and one of the key determinants of sustainability was the degree to which the project was "fair" to all parties involved. Thus, Cobban would need to assess not only the private returns, but also the social returns as measured by the project's economic rate of return (ERR). To do so, he would have to consider the various groups affected by the project and, where possible, quantify the impact on them.

Case Authors : Benjamin C. Esty, Carrie Ferman, Frank J. Lysy

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Emerging markets, Financial analysis, Government, Project management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006887)	-10006887	-	-
Year 1	3443754	-6563133	3443754	0.9434	3248825
Year 2	3954703	-2608430	7398457	0.89	3519672
Year 3	3955288	1346858	11353745	0.8396	3320936
Year 4	3236479	4583337	14590224	0.7921	2563595
TOTAL			14590224		12653027

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2646140

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cobban Sugar shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cobban Sugar have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cobban Sugar often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cobban Sugar needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006887)	-10006887	-	-
Year 1	3443754	-6563133	3443754	0.8696	2994569
Year 2	3954703	-2608430	7398457	0.7561	2990324
Year 3	3955288	1346858	11353745	0.6575	2600666
Year 4	3236479	4583337	14590224	0.5718	1850467
TOTAL					10436026

The Net NPV after 4 years is 429139

(10436026 - 10006887 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006887)	-10006887	-	-
Year 1	3443754	-6563133	3443754	0.8333	2869795
Year 2	3954703	-2608430	7398457	0.6944	2746322
Year 3	3955288	1346858	11353745	0.5787	2288940
Year 4	3236479	4583337	14590224	0.4823	1560802
TOTAL					9465858

The Net NPV after 4 years is -541029

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9465858 - 10006887 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cobban Sugar to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cobban Sugar has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cobban Sugar can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cobban Sugar, then the stock price of the Cobban Sugar should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cobban Sugar should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Benjamin C. Esty, Carrie Ferman, Frank J. Lysy (2018), "Nghe An Tate & Lyle Sugar Co. (Vietnam), Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.