×




DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Shlomo Ben-Hur, Jamie Anderson. The DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A) (referred as “Dt Dt's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Organizational culture, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A) Case Study


This is a classic transformation case, made more complex by the fact that it involves a huge organization led by a youthful company insider, RenA? Obermann. The two-part case study covers the period from 2006 to 2010. The case starts in late 2006, shortly after Obermann was promoted to replace Kai-Uwe Ricke at Deutsche Telekom (DT), one of the standard-bearers of the German economy.When he took over as chief executive, the former state-owned telecom monopoly was in bad shape. Having long been one of the dominant players in Europe, DT's share price had collapsed in just a few years, as had its grip on its home market. Shortly before Obermann was appointed, DT's share of new broadband customers in Germany - its traditional stronghold - fell to below 10 percent. And with its 260,000 strong workforce, DT's labor costs compared to sales were up to twice as high as those of its main European rivals. Still living on past glories, the company was heavily siloed and bloated. While its structure was not suited to the new market realities, few employees felt a strong need for anything more than incremental change. Yet many analysts foresaw either bankruptcy or break-up for DT within a matter of three or four years. Under Obermann's leadership, DT underwent a dramatic transformation, regaining its dominant position in the large domestic market within three years - but it remained too early to declare a full-fledged turnaround. Case A describes Deutsche Telekom's competitive challenges prior to RenA? Obermann's appointment as CEO. It gives a few background details on the new CEO and describes some of the key moves he made during his first two years at the helm - and his success in stabilizing DT. Case B covers the second phase of DT's recovery and the continued drive to create a single integrated company, to overcome resistance and to encourage new behaviors. Learning objectives: The cases cover three key themes: 1) The advantages and disadvantages of a strong organizational culture. 2) The process of organizational transformation and the challenge of building on success. 3) Some of the psychological challenges of leadership.


Case Authors : Shlomo Ben-Hur, Jamie Anderson

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership, Organizational culture, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011841) -10011841 - -
Year 1 3449687 -6562154 3449687 0.9434 3254422
Year 2 3954096 -2608058 7403783 0.89 3519131
Year 3 3964168 1356110 11367951 0.8396 3328392
Year 4 3243321 4599431 14611272 0.7921 2569014
TOTAL 14611272 12670959




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2659118

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dt Dt's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dt Dt's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dt Dt's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dt Dt's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011841) -10011841 - -
Year 1 3449687 -6562154 3449687 0.8696 2999728
Year 2 3954096 -2608058 7403783 0.7561 2989865
Year 3 3964168 1356110 11367951 0.6575 2606505
Year 4 3243321 4599431 14611272 0.5718 1854379
TOTAL 10450477


The Net NPV after 4 years is 438636

(10450477 - 10011841 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011841) -10011841 - -
Year 1 3449687 -6562154 3449687 0.8333 2874739
Year 2 3954096 -2608058 7403783 0.6944 2745900
Year 3 3964168 1356110 11367951 0.5787 2294079
Year 4 3243321 4599431 14611272 0.4823 1564102
TOTAL 9478819


The Net NPV after 4 years is -533022

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478819 - 10011841 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dt Dt's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dt Dt's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dt Dt's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dt Dt's, then the stock price of the Dt Dt's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dt Dt's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A)

References & Further Readings

Shlomo Ben-Hur, Jamie Anderson (2018), "DEUTSCHE TELEKOM: A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Seoyon Top Metal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Nanjing Yueboo Power A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Sz Topband A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Shenzhen Hifuture Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Jaya Real Property SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Welcron SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Techcomp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


China Information Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Isra Vision SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Shenguan Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing