×




Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rolando Tomasini, Margaret Hanson, Luk N. Van Wassenhove. The Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner (referred as “Humanitarian Lebanon” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Risk management, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner Case Study


Agility is a global logistics provider, based in Kuwait. In 2006, it reorganized and joined the ranks of the top ten global logistics providers worldwide. Following this reorganization, CEO Tarek Sultan took the initiative to give greater definition to his company's corporate social responsibility (CSR) profile. Shortly after his first company-wide statement, humanitarian crisis emerges in Lebanon. Urged on by its employees from the region, including the 120 employees and company office located in Lebanon, the company reaches out to assist the international humanitarian relief effort. The case chronicles the unique position of this global company as a humanitarian partner. Agility's assets build on its position as an emerging market multinational, and the unique assets of its employees from the regions. Leveraging those assets, Agility offers its services in partnership with the international humanitarian relief effort in Lebanon.


Case Authors : Rolando Tomasini, Margaret Hanson, Luk N. Van Wassenhove

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Risk management, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022294) -10022294 - -
Year 1 3450953 -6571341 3450953 0.9434 3255616
Year 2 3961208 -2610133 7412161 0.89 3525461
Year 3 3939805 1329672 11351966 0.8396 3307936
Year 4 3229498 4559170 14581464 0.7921 2558065
TOTAL 14581464 12647078




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2624784

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Humanitarian Lebanon shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Humanitarian Lebanon have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Humanitarian Lebanon often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Humanitarian Lebanon needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022294) -10022294 - -
Year 1 3450953 -6571341 3450953 0.8696 3000829
Year 2 3961208 -2610133 7412161 0.7561 2995242
Year 3 3939805 1329672 11351966 0.6575 2590486
Year 4 3229498 4559170 14581464 0.5718 1846476
TOTAL 10433033


The Net NPV after 4 years is 410739

(10433033 - 10022294 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022294) -10022294 - -
Year 1 3450953 -6571341 3450953 0.8333 2875794
Year 2 3961208 -2610133 7412161 0.6944 2750839
Year 3 3939805 1329672 11351966 0.5787 2279980
Year 4 3229498 4559170 14581464 0.4823 1557435
TOTAL 9464048


The Net NPV after 4 years is -558246

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9464048 - 10022294 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Humanitarian Lebanon to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Humanitarian Lebanon has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Humanitarian Lebanon can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Humanitarian Lebanon, then the stock price of the Humanitarian Lebanon should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Humanitarian Lebanon should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner

References & Further Readings

Rolando Tomasini, Margaret Hanson, Luk N. Van Wassenhove (2018), "Agility: A Global Logistics Company and Local Humanitarian Partner Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kyungin Synthe SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Jereh Oilfield A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Canudilo Fashion A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Zh Semicon A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


GemVax & KAEL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Universe SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Changyuan Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Mlabs Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Ryukil C&S Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures