×




Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Cedric Lepine, Michel Cossette. The Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division (referred as “Montra De” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division Case Study


If the HR function is to become a strategic partner within an organization, it must be able to measure the results of its activities and programs. But how? The case places students in the position of an external consultant who is mandated to identify and develop indicators that will be used to establish a balanced scorecard for the head of the Staffing and Workforce Planning Division of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al (STM). This is a decision-making case, since it asks students to decide on the relevant indicators to be selected for the balanced scorecard. At the same time, it can also be regarded as an analytical case, in that the solutions/indicators must be based on an exhaustive analysis of the situation and information conveyed in the case and its appendices.


Case Authors : Cedric Lepine, Michel Cossette

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007009) -10007009 - -
Year 1 3458039 -6548970 3458039 0.9434 3262301
Year 2 3964638 -2584332 7422677 0.89 3528514
Year 3 3936124 1351792 11358801 0.8396 3304846
Year 4 3235971 4587763 14594772 0.7921 2563192
TOTAL 14594772 12658852




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651843

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Montra De shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Montra De have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Montra De often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Montra De needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007009) -10007009 - -
Year 1 3458039 -6548970 3458039 0.8696 3006990
Year 2 3964638 -2584332 7422677 0.7561 2997836
Year 3 3936124 1351792 11358801 0.6575 2588065
Year 4 3235971 4587763 14594772 0.5718 1850177
TOTAL 10443069


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436060

(10443069 - 10007009 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007009) -10007009 - -
Year 1 3458039 -6548970 3458039 0.8333 2881699
Year 2 3964638 -2584332 7422677 0.6944 2753221
Year 3 3936124 1351792 11358801 0.5787 2277850
Year 4 3235971 4587763 14594772 0.4823 1560557
TOTAL 9473327


The Net NPV after 4 years is -533682

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473327 - 10007009 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Montra De to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Montra De has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Montra De can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Montra De, then the stock price of the Montra De should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Montra De should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division

References & Further Readings

Cedric Lepine, Michel Cossette (2018), "Measuring the Results of the HR Function: The Case of the SociA?tA? de transport de MontrA?al's Staffing and Workforce Planning Division Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Boston Properties SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Proteome SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Telkom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Arwana Citramulia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Hind Syntex Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Wang Yang SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Augros SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


BMO UK High SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Zhejiang Orient SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Ubiteq SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.