×




Euroland Foods S.A. Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Euroland Foods S.A. case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Euroland Foods S.A. case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert F. Bruner, Casey S. Opitz. The Euroland Foods S.A. (referred as “Projects 2001” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Budgeting, Financial analysis.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Euroland Foods S.A. Case Study


In January 2001, the senior management committee of this company has to decide which major projects should be funded for implementation by the company starting in 2001. The board of directors arbitrarily set a limit of (euros) EUR120 million to be spent on capital projects in 2001. Various managers, however, have proposed projects totaling EUR316 million. The task for the student is to evaluate the completed discounted cash flow (DCF) analyses presented along with qualitative factors (mainly strategic considerations and internal politics of the company), and to choose the projects to be approved.


Case Authors : Robert F. Bruner, Casey S. Opitz

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Budgeting, Financial analysis




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Euroland Foods S.A. Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022437) -10022437 - -
Year 1 3468857 -6553580 3468857 0.9434 3272507
Year 2 3978330 -2575250 7447187 0.89 3540700
Year 3 3972614 1397364 11419801 0.8396 3335483
Year 4 3227511 4624875 14647312 0.7921 2556491
TOTAL 14647312 12705180




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2682743

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Projects 2001 shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Projects 2001 have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Euroland Foods S.A.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Projects 2001 often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Projects 2001 needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022437) -10022437 - -
Year 1 3468857 -6553580 3468857 0.8696 3016397
Year 2 3978330 -2575250 7447187 0.7561 3008189
Year 3 3972614 1397364 11419801 0.6575 2612058
Year 4 3227511 4624875 14647312 0.5718 1845340
TOTAL 10481985


The Net NPV after 4 years is 459548

(10481985 - 10022437 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022437) -10022437 - -
Year 1 3468857 -6553580 3468857 0.8333 2890714
Year 2 3978330 -2575250 7447187 0.6944 2762729
Year 3 3972614 1397364 11419801 0.5787 2298966
Year 4 3227511 4624875 14647312 0.4823 1556477
TOTAL 9508887


The Net NPV after 4 years is -513550

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9508887 - 10022437 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Projects 2001 to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Projects 2001 has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Projects 2001 can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Projects 2001, then the stock price of the Projects 2001 should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Projects 2001 should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Euroland Foods S.A.

References & Further Readings

Robert F. Bruner, Casey S. Opitz (2018), "Euroland Foods S.A. Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tiemco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Euronet SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Dialog SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Ningbo Cixing SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Golden Seed Wine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Johan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


JHS Svendgaard Laboratories SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Plato Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


GD Power Dev SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities