×




Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Nithyananda KV. The Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C) (referred as “Nath Sunitha” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C) Case Study


This is Case C in a three-case series. In December 2015, the managing director and chief executive officer of Sunitha Nath Boutiques in Bengaluru, discovered that her most trusted employee had abandoned and deceived her. She had recruited the employee as an intern and mentored him during his growth within the organization, eventually promoting him to the post of studio manager with complete power to run the business in her absence. But the employee had quit his job without giving any notice; stolen confidential information, designs, and documents relating to the business; and started his own competing design firm in Bengaluru. One of Sunitha Nath Boutiques's important projects had been terminated by email a little while earlier, and the rumour was that her ex-employee was continuing to work on that project under his new design firm. In this case, the managing director and her lawyer reviewed the nature of confidential information and trade secrets. They also explored what intellectual property rights the managing director had and how she might prevent her ex-employee and others from misappropriating or stealing that information. See Case A and Case B. Nithyananda KV is affiliated with Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli.


Case Authors : Nithyananda KV

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004398) -10004398 - -
Year 1 3447394 -6557004 3447394 0.9434 3252258
Year 2 3977702 -2579302 7425096 0.89 3540141
Year 3 3959946 1380644 11385042 0.8396 3324847
Year 4 3227040 4607684 14612082 0.7921 2556118
TOTAL 14612082 12673364




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2668966

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nath Sunitha shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nath Sunitha have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nath Sunitha often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nath Sunitha needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004398) -10004398 - -
Year 1 3447394 -6557004 3447394 0.8696 2997734
Year 2 3977702 -2579302 7425096 0.7561 3007714
Year 3 3959946 1380644 11385042 0.6575 2603729
Year 4 3227040 4607684 14612082 0.5718 1845071
TOTAL 10454247


The Net NPV after 4 years is 449849

(10454247 - 10004398 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004398) -10004398 - -
Year 1 3447394 -6557004 3447394 0.8333 2872828
Year 2 3977702 -2579302 7425096 0.6944 2762293
Year 3 3959946 1380644 11385042 0.5787 2291635
Year 4 3227040 4607684 14612082 0.4823 1556250
TOTAL 9483007


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521391

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483007 - 10004398 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nath Sunitha to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nath Sunitha has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nath Sunitha can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nath Sunitha, then the stock price of the Nath Sunitha should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nath Sunitha should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C)

References & Further Readings

Nithyananda KV (2018), "Sunitha Nath Boutiques: Intellectual Property Rights (C) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


RightCrowd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


NexJ Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Celgene SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


K3 Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Quickstep Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense