×




The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Karin Schnarr, Mathew Krizmanich, Chelsea Lee. The The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future (referred as “Kitchener Rangers” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future Case Study


In 2015, the chief operating officer of the Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club had to consider short- and long-term options to maintain and increase the success of the organization. Given its strong community support, the Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club was in the enviable position of having an 800-person waiting list for season tickets; however, this scenario caused a perception that games were always sold out, which discouraged a new generation of fans from attending. Given the organization's nonprofit governance model, any plan the chief operating officer considered would have to be adopted by the players and staff, as well as ticket holders, fans, local municipalities, and community residents. Possible courses of action included building a larger stadium, leveraging new marketing opportunities, and bidding for control of stadium concessions. How could the Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club continue its success while attracting a new generation of fans? Karin Schnarr is affiliated with Wilfrid Laurier University. Chelsea Lee is affiliated with Wilfrid Laurier University.


Case Authors : Karin Schnarr, Mathew Krizmanich, Chelsea Lee

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Growth strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020941) -10020941 - -
Year 1 3444724 -6576217 3444724 0.9434 3249740
Year 2 3974083 -2602134 7418807 0.89 3536920
Year 3 3945405 1343271 11364212 0.8396 3312638
Year 4 3235288 4578559 14599500 0.7921 2562651
TOTAL 14599500 12661949




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641008

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kitchener Rangers shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kitchener Rangers have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kitchener Rangers often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kitchener Rangers needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020941) -10020941 - -
Year 1 3444724 -6576217 3444724 0.8696 2995412
Year 2 3974083 -2602134 7418807 0.7561 3004978
Year 3 3945405 1343271 11364212 0.6575 2594168
Year 4 3235288 4578559 14599500 0.5718 1849786
TOTAL 10444344


The Net NPV after 4 years is 423403

(10444344 - 10020941 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020941) -10020941 - -
Year 1 3444724 -6576217 3444724 0.8333 2870603
Year 2 3974083 -2602134 7418807 0.6944 2759780
Year 3 3945405 1343271 11364212 0.5787 2283220
Year 4 3235288 4578559 14599500 0.4823 1560228
TOTAL 9473831


The Net NPV after 4 years is -547110

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473831 - 10020941 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kitchener Rangers to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kitchener Rangers has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kitchener Rangers can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kitchener Rangers, then the stock price of the Kitchener Rangers should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kitchener Rangers should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future

References & Further Readings

Karin Schnarr, Mathew Krizmanich, Chelsea Lee (2018), "The Kitchener Rangers Hockey Club: Skating into the Future Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Forlife SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Chuan Huat Res SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Sheng Yuan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Kingold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Kehua A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


YHI International Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Guangdong Hoshion SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products