Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Charles Ewald, Heidi Krauel Patel, Jaclyn C. Foroughi. The Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors (referred as “Bank Investors” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors Case Study

In the fall of 2015, Beneficial State Bank was set to mark its third successive year of normalized profitability while continuing to fulfill its mission to promote social justice and environmental sustainability. At the same time, husband and wife creators of the bank, Tom Steyer (MBA '83) and Kat Taylor (JD/MBA '86), found themselves at a crossroads. As the sole providers of capital to the bank during formation and, as a result of the bank's unique organizational structure, the couple remained the only investors in the bank almost a decade since its founding. With assets of $420 million, the team envisioned scaling the business for both economic viability and impact to over ten times the current size in the coming years. In order to achieve this goal, however, the founders would have to consider the introduction of additional investors. This case describes the motivating factors for changing the bank's existing capital structure, and potential investment options to fulfill these goals. It includes a discussion of prospective investors, existing capitalization and growth prospects, and the role of mergers and acquisitions.

Case Authors : Charles Ewald, Heidi Krauel Patel, Jaclyn C. Foroughi

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018453)	-10018453	-	-
Year 1	3471437	-6547016	3471437	0.9434	3274941
Year 2	3981671	-2565345	7453108	0.89	3543673
Year 3	3962224	1396879	11415332	0.8396	3326760
Year 4	3225320	4622199	14640652	0.7921	2554756
TOTAL			14640652		12700129

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681676

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Bank Investors have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Bank Investors shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Bank Investors often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Bank Investors needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018453)	-10018453	-	-
Year 1	3471437	-6547016	3471437	0.8696	3018641
Year 2	3981671	-2565345	7453108	0.7561	3010715
Year 3	3962224	1396879	11415332	0.6575	2605227
Year 4	3225320	4622199	14640652	0.5718	1844087
TOTAL					10478670

The Net NPV after 4 years is 460217

(10478670 - 10018453 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018453)	-10018453	-	-
Year 1	3471437	-6547016	3471437	0.8333	2892864
Year 2	3981671	-2565345	7453108	0.6944	2765049
Year 3	3962224	1396879	11415332	0.5787	2292954
Year 4	3225320	4622199	14640652	0.4823	1555421
TOTAL					9506288

The Net NPV after 4 years is -512165

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9506288 - 10018453 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Bank Investors to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Bank Investors has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Bank Investors can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Bank Investors, then the stock price of the Bank Investors should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Bank Investors should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors

References & Further Readings

Charles Ewald, Heidi Krauel Patel, Jaclyn C. Foroughi (2018), "Beneficial State Bank (B): Evaluating Financial and Social Returns for Investors Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.