×




Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael Crooke, Mark Chun, Amanda Kastelic. The Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage (referred as “Clover Food” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Entrepreneurship, Social responsibility, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage Case Study


By July 2012, the founder of Clover Food Lab (Clover) had created a profitable business that served locally sourced, organic, vegetarian fast food. Over the course of four years, Clover had grown from one food truck parked on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) campus in Cambridge to five food trucks and two brick-and-mortar restaurants in the metropolitan Boston area. With loyal customers advocating for the brand, the CEO knew that his company was well positioned for continued growth. He dreamed of turning Clover into a global fast-food provider, capturing enough market share to compete directly with international fast-food chains like McDonald's. In 2014, he considered expanding his company into a new market and wondered whether Clover's vision and operations could be duplicated. Michael Crooke is affiliated with Pepperdine University. Mark Chun is affiliated with Pepperdine University. Amanda Kastelic is affiliated with Pepperdine University.


Case Authors : Michael Crooke, Mark Chun, Amanda Kastelic

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Entrepreneurship, Social responsibility, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009799) -10009799 - -
Year 1 3469754 -6540045 3469754 0.9434 3273353
Year 2 3971726 -2568319 7441480 0.89 3534822
Year 3 3961696 1393377 11403176 0.8396 3326316
Year 4 3242228 4635605 14645404 0.7921 2568148
TOTAL 14645404 12702639




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2692840

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Clover Food have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Clover Food shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Clover Food often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Clover Food needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009799) -10009799 - -
Year 1 3469754 -6540045 3469754 0.8696 3017177
Year 2 3971726 -2568319 7441480 0.7561 3003195
Year 3 3961696 1393377 11403176 0.6575 2604879
Year 4 3242228 4635605 14645404 0.5718 1853754
TOTAL 10479007


The Net NPV after 4 years is 469208

(10479007 - 10009799 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009799) -10009799 - -
Year 1 3469754 -6540045 3469754 0.8333 2891462
Year 2 3971726 -2568319 7441480 0.6944 2758143
Year 3 3961696 1393377 11403176 0.5787 2292648
Year 4 3242228 4635605 14645404 0.4823 1563574
TOTAL 9505827


The Net NPV after 4 years is -503972

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505827 - 10009799 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Clover Food to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Clover Food has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Clover Food can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Clover Food, then the stock price of the Clover Food should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Clover Food should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage

References & Further Readings

Michael Crooke, Mark Chun, Amanda Kastelic (2018), "Clover Food Lab: Sustainability as Competitive Advantage Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


MY EG Services SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Shenzhen Friendcom Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Wavelock Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Handeni Gold Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Shanghai New World SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


Spigen Korea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Maruichi Steel Tube Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Daiwa Motor Transport SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Japan Material SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services