×




Terry Lundgren at Macy's Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Terry Lundgren at Macy's case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Terry Lundgren at Macy's case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jose B. Alvarez, Robert Steven Kaplan, Natalie Kindred. The Terry Lundgren at Macy's (referred as “Macy's Lundgren” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competition, Competitive strategy, Leadership, Marketing, Organizational culture.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Terry Lundgren at Macy's Case Study


In 2008 and 2009, a period of severe economic turmoil, Macy's CEO Terry Lundgren led a large-scale transformation of the iconic department store. Having previously converted the many department stores owned by Macy's to the Macy's names (except Bloomingdale's), Lundgren and his team set out to create a more efficient, dynamic organization. Their "One Macy's" initiative consolidated and centralized all key functions, while their "My Macy's" initiative focused on customizing the offerings of individual stores to local markets. By 2011, Macy's had many advantages, including an energized, highly experienced executive team; a nationwide presence and strong brand in the U.S.; a competitive offering of private label and exclusive brands; and, following the execution of One Macy's and My Macy's, a fresh, unique foundation for future growth. However, the company still faces significant challenges, including low sales productivity (in part due to the large size of its stores), the decline of mall-based shopping, poor floor-level sales capabilities, lack of appeal to younger consumers, intensifying competition, and an overall dearth of future growth opportunities. This case allows students to assess Lundgren's leadership to date and options for the future, as well as the overall viability of the department store business model.


Case Authors : Jose B. Alvarez, Robert Steven Kaplan, Natalie Kindred

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Competition, Competitive strategy, Leadership, Marketing, Organizational culture




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Terry Lundgren at Macy's Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016448) -10016448 - -
Year 1 3458459 -6557989 3458459 0.9434 3262697
Year 2 3974470 -2583519 7432929 0.89 3537264
Year 3 3955998 1372479 11388927 0.8396 3321532
Year 4 3247185 4619664 14636112 0.7921 2572075
TOTAL 14636112 12693568




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677120

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Macy's Lundgren shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Macy's Lundgren have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Terry Lundgren at Macy's

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Macy's Lundgren often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Macy's Lundgren needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016448) -10016448 - -
Year 1 3458459 -6557989 3458459 0.8696 3007356
Year 2 3974470 -2583519 7432929 0.7561 3005270
Year 3 3955998 1372479 11388927 0.6575 2601133
Year 4 3247185 4619664 14636112 0.5718 1856589
TOTAL 10470347


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453899

(10470347 - 10016448 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016448) -10016448 - -
Year 1 3458459 -6557989 3458459 0.8333 2882049
Year 2 3974470 -2583519 7432929 0.6944 2760049
Year 3 3955998 1372479 11388927 0.5787 2289351
Year 4 3247185 4619664 14636112 0.4823 1565965
TOTAL 9497413


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519035

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497413 - 10016448 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Macy's Lundgren to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Macy's Lundgren has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Macy's Lundgren can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Macy's Lundgren, then the stock price of the Macy's Lundgren should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Macy's Lundgren should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Terry Lundgren at Macy's

References & Further Readings

Jose B. Alvarez, Robert Steven Kaplan, Natalie Kindred (2018), "Terry Lundgren at Macy's Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


HolidayCheck SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


ISR Capital Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Jiajiayue SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)


Semisysco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


COPEL PNB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Orchid Isla SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Victoria Oil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Meituan Dianping SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Catalog & Mail Order)