×




Sara Campbell Ltd. (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sara Campbell Ltd. (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sara Campbell Ltd. (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Romana L. Autrey, V.G. Narayanan, Julia Rozovsky. The Sara Campbell Ltd. (A) (referred as “Campbell Holt” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Conflict, Corporate governance.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Sara Campbell Ltd. (A) Case Study


Describes a situation in which Sara Campbell, the CEO of a women's apparel company, must decide how to resolve the tense relationship with her Financial Controller and ex-brother-in-law, Stephen Holt. Holt was employed by Campbell for 10 years, took on the majority of financial responsibilities for the firm, and knew the business very well. Although he was bright, Campbell was often disappointed by his poor judgment and disorderly nature. By 1999, two incidents by Holt forced Campbell to question how she should proceed in terms of his employment. Students are given context to debate whether Holt's behavior was detrimental enough to overshadow a successful ten-year working relationship and his monetary obligations to Campbell's immediate family.


Case Authors : Romana L. Autrey, V.G. Narayanan, Julia Rozovsky

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Conflict, Corporate governance




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sara Campbell Ltd. (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021560) -10021560 - -
Year 1 3470753 -6550807 3470753 0.9434 3274295
Year 2 3958153 -2592654 7428906 0.89 3522742
Year 3 3948002 1355348 11376908 0.8396 3314819
Year 4 3250241 4605589 14627149 0.7921 2574495
TOTAL 14627149 12686351




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2664791

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Campbell Holt have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Campbell Holt shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sara Campbell Ltd. (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Campbell Holt often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Campbell Holt needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021560) -10021560 - -
Year 1 3470753 -6550807 3470753 0.8696 3018046
Year 2 3958153 -2592654 7428906 0.7561 2992932
Year 3 3948002 1355348 11376908 0.6575 2595875
Year 4 3250241 4605589 14627149 0.5718 1858336
TOTAL 10465190


The Net NPV after 4 years is 443630

(10465190 - 10021560 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021560) -10021560 - -
Year 1 3470753 -6550807 3470753 0.8333 2892294
Year 2 3958153 -2592654 7428906 0.6944 2748717
Year 3 3948002 1355348 11376908 0.5787 2284723
Year 4 3250241 4605589 14627149 0.4823 1567439
TOTAL 9493174


The Net NPV after 4 years is -528386

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9493174 - 10021560 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Campbell Holt to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Campbell Holt has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Campbell Holt can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Campbell Holt, then the stock price of the Campbell Holt should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Campbell Holt should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Sara Campbell Ltd. (A)

References & Further Readings

Romana L. Autrey, V.G. Narayanan, Julia Rozovsky (2018), "Sara Campbell Ltd. (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Connexus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Qixiang Chem A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Ashimori Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Nippo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


IFCA MSC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Adomani SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Astrotech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Fine Sinter SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Medtechnica SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies