×




PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ridhima Aggarwal, Stephen E. Chick, Francoise Simon. The PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care (referred as “Patientslikeme Health” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Customers, Decision making, Internet, Regulation, Security & privacy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care Case Study


PatientsLikeMe, an health online community formed to provide value for patients in exchange for sharing their health data, had grown substantially since its founding in 2004. By 2016 it had over 130 employees. However, convincing investors of the viability of the business model proves more challenging. Its three founders believe it has the potential to reshape the healthcare ecosystem, but its "not just for profit" approach is complex to communicate. In their ambition to improve the healthcare experience by capturing health outcomes and learning what works in the real world (beyond clinical trials) - they must attend to critical issues such as patient privacy in addition to setting their growth strategy.


Case Authors : Ridhima Aggarwal, Stephen E. Chick, Francoise Simon

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Customers, Decision making, Internet, Regulation, Security & privacy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017027) -10017027 - -
Year 1 3460268 -6556759 3460268 0.9434 3264404
Year 2 3962689 -2594070 7422957 0.89 3526779
Year 3 3969398 1375328 11392355 0.8396 3332783
Year 4 3233032 4608360 14625387 0.7921 2560864
TOTAL 14625387 12684830




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2667803

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Patientslikeme Health shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Patientslikeme Health have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Patientslikeme Health often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Patientslikeme Health needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017027) -10017027 - -
Year 1 3460268 -6556759 3460268 0.8696 3008929
Year 2 3962689 -2594070 7422957 0.7561 2996362
Year 3 3969398 1375328 11392355 0.6575 2609944
Year 4 3233032 4608360 14625387 0.5718 1848497
TOTAL 10463731


The Net NPV after 4 years is 446704

(10463731 - 10017027 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017027) -10017027 - -
Year 1 3460268 -6556759 3460268 0.8333 2883557
Year 2 3962689 -2594070 7422957 0.6944 2751867
Year 3 3969398 1375328 11392355 0.5787 2297105
Year 4 3233032 4608360 14625387 0.4823 1559140
TOTAL 9491669


The Net NPV after 4 years is -525358

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491669 - 10017027 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Patientslikeme Health to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Patientslikeme Health has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Patientslikeme Health can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Patientslikeme Health, then the stock price of the Patientslikeme Health should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Patientslikeme Health should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care

References & Further Readings

Ridhima Aggarwal, Stephen E. Chick, Francoise Simon (2018), "PatientsLikeMe: Using Social Network Health Data to Improve Patient Care Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kino Indonesia Tbk PT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


IGD SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Sata Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


JTC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Centrale del Latte SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Byron Energy Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


U-Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Hatsun Agro Product Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing