×




Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John A. Pearce II. The Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing (referred as “Domestic Outsourcing” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing Case Study


With cost advantages from manufacturing in Asia and Mexico steadily deteriorating, U.S. firms are reassessing the option of domestic outsourcing to remain globally competitive. The challenge in evaluating international versus domestic outsourcing strategic options lies in that first-movers are extremely and intentionally vague about how they reach their decisions. The purpose of this article is to reveal these reasons by providing statistical and firm-based evidence on five major factors that are influencing the decision regarding where U.S. companies should manufacture to optimize their gross profits. The factors include (1) increasingly competitive U.S. labor costs; (2) increasing productivity of the U.S. workforce; (3) increasingly competitive domestic production costs; (4) incentives from federal, state, and local governments; and (5) improved synchronization of production with other business functions.


Case Authors : John A. Pearce II

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004118) -10004118 - -
Year 1 3454824 -6549294 3454824 0.9434 3259268
Year 2 3954654 -2594640 7409478 0.89 3519628
Year 3 3937264 1342624 11346742 0.8396 3305803
Year 4 3243844 4586468 14590586 0.7921 2569428
TOTAL 14590586 12654127




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2650009

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Domestic Outsourcing have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Domestic Outsourcing shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Domestic Outsourcing often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Domestic Outsourcing needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004118) -10004118 - -
Year 1 3454824 -6549294 3454824 0.8696 3004195
Year 2 3954654 -2594640 7409478 0.7561 2990287
Year 3 3937264 1342624 11346742 0.6575 2588815
Year 4 3243844 4586468 14590586 0.5718 1854678
TOTAL 10437975


The Net NPV after 4 years is 433857

(10437975 - 10004118 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004118) -10004118 - -
Year 1 3454824 -6549294 3454824 0.8333 2879020
Year 2 3954654 -2594640 7409478 0.6944 2746288
Year 3 3937264 1342624 11346742 0.5787 2278509
Year 4 3243844 4586468 14590586 0.4823 1564354
TOTAL 9468171


The Net NPV after 4 years is -535947

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9468171 - 10004118 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Domestic Outsourcing to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Domestic Outsourcing has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Domestic Outsourcing can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Domestic Outsourcing, then the stock price of the Domestic Outsourcing should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Domestic Outsourcing should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing

References & Further Readings

John A. Pearce II (2018), "Why Domestic Outsourcing is Leading America's Reemergence in Global Manufacturing Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


CJ Freshway SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Alamos Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


KC Feed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Jpmorgan Elect PLC 0.003p SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Emerson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Ekovest SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Izmo Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Maurel et Prom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Velesto Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Mecaro SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing