Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Antonino Vaccaro. The Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims (referred as “Damages Damage” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims Case Study

This technical note briefly discusses some fundamental issues related to damage evaluation and claim introducing some important practical and ethical problems associated with it. It is important to immediately highlight that this issue is becoming increasingly important for managers and decision makers around the world for at least three reasons. First, globalization and increased use of technological and operational complexity increases the exposure of companies to material and immaterial damages. Thus, managers often have to deal with the quantification of damages in the context of trials, arbitrations and out-of-court settlements. Second, the legislations of European and North American countries are progressively increasing the liability of top managers for the eventual damages caused by their decisions to the company and to critical stakeholders such as customers, suppliers and partners. Third, the spread of consumers' associations, and the even more frequent use of class actions, is increasing the number of legal proceedings against companies.

Case Authors : Antonino Vaccaro

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006748)	-10006748	-	-
Year 1	3456477	-6550271	3456477	0.9434	3260827
Year 2	3975028	-2575243	7431505	0.89	3537761
Year 3	3950409	1375166	11381914	0.8396	3316840
Year 4	3236972	4612138	14618886	0.7921	2563985
TOTAL			14618886		12679413

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672665

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Damages Damage have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Damages Damage shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Damages Damage often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Damages Damage needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006748)	-10006748	-	-
Year 1	3456477	-6550271	3456477	0.8696	3005632
Year 2	3975028	-2575243	7431505	0.7561	3005692
Year 3	3950409	1375166	11381914	0.6575	2597458
Year 4	3236972	4612138	14618886	0.5718	1850749
TOTAL					10459532

The Net NPV after 4 years is 452784

(10459532 - 10006748 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006748)	-10006748	-	-
Year 1	3456477	-6550271	3456477	0.8333	2880398
Year 2	3975028	-2575243	7431505	0.6944	2760436
Year 3	3950409	1375166	11381914	0.5787	2286116
Year 4	3236972	4612138	14618886	0.4823	1561040
TOTAL					9487990

The Net NPV after 4 years is -518758

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487990 - 10006748 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Damages Damage to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Damages Damage has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Damages Damage can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Damages Damage, then the stock price of the Damages Damage should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Damages Damage should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims

References & Further Readings

Antonino Vaccaro (2018), "Practical and Ethical Problems in Damage Evaluation and Claims Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.