×




JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Yiorgos Allayannis, Adam Risell. The JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act (referred as “Jpmorgan Dodd” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act Case Study


In October, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase & Co., is preparing for the company's 2010 Q3 earnings conference call and wondering how to address the inevitable questions related to financial reform. It has been just over two months since the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) was passed, and there is still much uncertainty as to how JPMorgan should address the reforms. JPMorgan had reported stronger than expected EPS in the third quarter, but analysts were more concerned about what strategic initiatives the CEO would implement in response to the Dodd-Frank Act. The act had introduced wide-ranging and industry-changing reforms that were aimed primarily at fully integrated financial institutions such as JPMorgan. While most of the rulemaking would be forthcoming from regulatory authorities, the CEO knows it would be best to address these issues immediately to protect shareholders by avoiding uncertainty.


Case Authors : Yiorgos Allayannis, Adam Risell

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013055) -10013055 - -
Year 1 3469888 -6543167 3469888 0.9434 3273479
Year 2 3982462 -2560705 7452350 0.89 3544377
Year 3 3938726 1378021 11391076 0.8396 3307030
Year 4 3247016 4625037 14638092 0.7921 2571941
TOTAL 14638092 12696827




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2683772

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Jpmorgan Dodd have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Jpmorgan Dodd shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Jpmorgan Dodd often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Jpmorgan Dodd needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013055) -10013055 - -
Year 1 3469888 -6543167 3469888 0.8696 3017294
Year 2 3982462 -2560705 7452350 0.7561 3011313
Year 3 3938726 1378021 11391076 0.6575 2589776
Year 4 3247016 4625037 14638092 0.5718 1856492
TOTAL 10474876


The Net NPV after 4 years is 461821

(10474876 - 10013055 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013055) -10013055 - -
Year 1 3469888 -6543167 3469888 0.8333 2891573
Year 2 3982462 -2560705 7452350 0.6944 2765599
Year 3 3938726 1378021 11391076 0.5787 2279355
Year 4 3247016 4625037 14638092 0.4823 1565883
TOTAL 9502411


The Net NPV after 4 years is -510644

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9502411 - 10013055 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Jpmorgan Dodd to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Jpmorgan Dodd has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Jpmorgan Dodd can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Jpmorgan Dodd, then the stock price of the Jpmorgan Dodd should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Jpmorgan Dodd should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act

References & Further Readings

Yiorgos Allayannis, Adam Risell (2018), "JPMorgan and the Dodd-Frank Act Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Eluon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Blockescence SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Poletowin Pitcrew SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Sanbio Company SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Bioquell PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Apollo Hospitals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Solara Active Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs