×




JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Zhigang Tao, Yihong Yao, W.H. Lo. The JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain (referred as “Jpmorgan Everbright” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Crisis management, Emerging markets, Ethics, Government, Growth strategy, Performance measurement.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain Case Study


In August 2013, the United States Securities and Exchanges Commission ("SEC") opened a bribery investigation into JPMorgan's "princeling hiring" practices in Hong Kong, China's Special Administrative Region. The investment bank's Hong Kong operation hired the daughter of a senior official of the state-owned China Railway Group ("CRG") in 2007, and the son of the chairman of state-owned China Everbright Group ("Everbright") in 2010. Months after the 2007 hiring, JPMorgan successfully secured the job of underwriting CRG's initial public offering ("IPO"). Similarly, although few business deals between JPMorgan and Everbright and its subsidiaries were made before 2010, JPMorgan then successfully secured several financial advisory jobs for the company. The US Security Exchange Commission's subsequent investigation put investment bank efforts to build "guanxi" in China by hiring princelings in the spotlight.


Case Authors : Zhigang Tao, Yihong Yao, W.H. Lo

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Crisis management, Emerging markets, Ethics, Government, Growth strategy, Performance measurement




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013413) -10013413 - -
Year 1 3462334 -6551079 3462334 0.9434 3266353
Year 2 3972287 -2578792 7434621 0.89 3535321
Year 3 3966337 1387545 11400958 0.8396 3330213
Year 4 3237652 4625197 14638610 0.7921 2564524
TOTAL 14638610 12696411




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2682998

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Jpmorgan Everbright shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Jpmorgan Everbright have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Jpmorgan Everbright often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Jpmorgan Everbright needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013413) -10013413 - -
Year 1 3462334 -6551079 3462334 0.8696 3010725
Year 2 3972287 -2578792 7434621 0.7561 3003620
Year 3 3966337 1387545 11400958 0.6575 2607931
Year 4 3237652 4625197 14638610 0.5718 1851138
TOTAL 10473414


The Net NPV after 4 years is 460001

(10473414 - 10013413 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013413) -10013413 - -
Year 1 3462334 -6551079 3462334 0.8333 2885278
Year 2 3972287 -2578792 7434621 0.6944 2758533
Year 3 3966337 1387545 11400958 0.5787 2295334
Year 4 3237652 4625197 14638610 0.4823 1561368
TOTAL 9500513


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512900

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9500513 - 10013413 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Jpmorgan Everbright to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Jpmorgan Everbright has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Jpmorgan Everbright can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Jpmorgan Everbright, then the stock price of the Jpmorgan Everbright should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Jpmorgan Everbright should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain

References & Further Readings

Zhigang Tao, Yihong Yao, W.H. Lo (2018), "JPMorgan: Hiring Chinese Princelings Becomes a Royal Pain Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Softline SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


China Fangda SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Astra International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Coreana Cosmetics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Sz Textile A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Grifols SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Niko Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Inovio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Hindustan Zinc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Oklo Resources Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Schneider Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls