SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Natalie Slawinski, Daina Mazutis, Brad Hookey. The SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A) (referred as “Shorefast Fogo” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A) Case Study

The Shorefast Foundation is a charitable organization that aims to spark a rural renaissance and promote economic and cultural resilience in the isolated communities of Fogo Island and Change Islands, Newfoundland, Canada, using a social entrepreneurship model. The cases also highlight the importance of rural places as repositories of local knowledge, culture and traditions. The two Shorefast cases illustrate the initial formation of the Foundation and the implementation issues surrounding the building of a multimillion dollar five star Inn. They are best used together as a series, but can be used independently as well. Case A provides information about the socioeconomic background of Fogo Island as well as an in depth profile of the founder of the Shorefast Foundation, Zita Cobb. The case illustrates how the founder of an organization can shape an organization's goals, vision, and beliefs. It also describes the model of social entrepreneurship that was being proposed and the organizational structure of the Shorefast Foundation and its affiliates as it stood before the construction of the revenue-generating Inn. Learning objectives: The case can be used to 1) introduce the concept of business models in general and explore the differences between 'traditional' and 'social entrepreneurship' business models; 2) help students understand the link between a founder's values, beliefs and objectives (managerial preferences) and strategy formulation and implementation; 3) introduce students to the organizational challenges involved in social entrepreneurship and the tensions to be negotiated between environmental, economic and social goals.

Case Authors : Natalie Slawinski, Daina Mazutis, Brad Hookey

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership, Sustainability

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017372)	-10017372	-	-
Year 1	3464649	-6552723	3464649	0.9434	3268537
Year 2	3957707	-2595016	7422356	0.89	3522345
Year 3	3941410	1346394	11363766	0.8396	3309284
Year 4	3233317	4579711	14597083	0.7921	2561090
TOTAL			14597083		12661256

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643884

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Shorefast Fogo have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Shorefast Fogo shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Shorefast Fogo often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Shorefast Fogo needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017372)	-10017372	-	-
Year 1	3464649	-6552723	3464649	0.8696	3012738
Year 2	3957707	-2595016	7422356	0.7561	2992595
Year 3	3941410	1346394	11363766	0.6575	2591541
Year 4	3233317	4579711	14597083	0.5718	1848659
TOTAL					10445534

The Net NPV after 4 years is 428162

(10445534 - 10017372 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10017372)	-10017372	-	-
Year 1	3464649	-6552723	3464649	0.8333	2887208
Year 2	3957707	-2595016	7422356	0.6944	2748408
Year 3	3941410	1346394	11363766	0.5787	2280909
Year 4	3233317	4579711	14597083	0.4823	1559277
TOTAL					9475801

The Net NPV after 4 years is -541571

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475801 - 10017372 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Shorefast Fogo to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Shorefast Fogo has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Shorefast Fogo can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Shorefast Fogo, then the stock price of the Shorefast Fogo should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Shorefast Fogo should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A)

References & Further Readings

Natalie Slawinski, Daina Mazutis, Brad Hookey (2018), "SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP ON FOGO ISLAND: SEARCHING FOR NEW WAYS IN AN OLD CONTINUITY (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.