×




The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Marie Rock, John A. Seeger. The The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence (referred as “Barnaba Trafficking” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Social responsibility, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence Case Study


Frank Barnaba has rescued people from human trafficking situations for decades and received an award from President Reagan for his work. Now retired, he has started the Barnaba Institute to continue his humanitarian mission. As its president, Frank is involved in providing direct services to victims of sex trafficking, often in dangerous urban environments in the Northeast. The Barnaba Institute not only provides necessities, such as clothing, to victims, but also education and training about the scope and dangers of human trafficking to other organizations and the general public. Contacts with many organizations, such as Covenant House, the largest nonprofit child services agency in the U.S., have provided a forum for Frank's outreach and rescue techniques. Barnaba Institute's executive director, however, is concerned not only with accomplishing the organization's mission, but with finding adequate resources. Having used up the "seed" funding during its first three years, the executive director must now review its choices for continuing into the future.


Case Authors : Marie Rock, John A. Seeger

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Social responsibility, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018160) -10018160 - -
Year 1 3453048 -6565112 3453048 0.9434 3257592
Year 2 3980758 -2584354 7433806 0.89 3542860
Year 3 3938161 1353807 11371967 0.8396 3306556
Year 4 3222183 4575990 14594150 0.7921 2552271
TOTAL 14594150 12659280




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641120

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Barnaba Trafficking have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Barnaba Trafficking shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Barnaba Trafficking often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Barnaba Trafficking needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018160) -10018160 - -
Year 1 3453048 -6565112 3453048 0.8696 3002650
Year 2 3980758 -2584354 7433806 0.7561 3010025
Year 3 3938161 1353807 11371967 0.6575 2589405
Year 4 3222183 4575990 14594150 0.5718 1842294
TOTAL 10444374


The Net NPV after 4 years is 426214

(10444374 - 10018160 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018160) -10018160 - -
Year 1 3453048 -6565112 3453048 0.8333 2877540
Year 2 3980758 -2584354 7433806 0.6944 2764415
Year 3 3938161 1353807 11371967 0.5787 2279028
Year 4 3222183 4575990 14594150 0.4823 1553908
TOTAL 9474891


The Net NPV after 4 years is -543269

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9474891 - 10018160 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Barnaba Trafficking to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Barnaba Trafficking has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Barnaba Trafficking can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Barnaba Trafficking, then the stock price of the Barnaba Trafficking should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Barnaba Trafficking should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence

References & Further Readings

Marie Rock, John A. Seeger (2018), "The Barnaba Institute: Fighting Human Trafficking and Building a Presence Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


AVIC International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Mosenergo DRC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Direct Insuranc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Daiwa House Reit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Xiamen International Port SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Ashiana Housing Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


OSJB Holdings Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services