Knowledge Management at the World Bank Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Knowledge Management at the World Bank case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Knowledge Management at the World Bank case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Donald Oppenheimer, Laurence Prusak. The Knowledge Management at the World Bank (referred as “Knowledge Bank” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Decision making, Knowledge management, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Knowledge Management at the World Bank Case Study

This case traces the history and evolution of Knowledge Management at the World Bank. While primarily a financial institution offering customized loans and grants across a wide range of sectors in some 100 countries, the World Bank has increasingly become involved in developing, storing, and transferring knowledge requested by its clients for project and other development. Currently there is a growing interest and demand for the sharing of Bank knowledge and its more formal knowledge-based advisory services. Many of the more advanced middle-income countries have graduated from the Bank's development assistance programs, but still want to have access to the Bank's knowledge capital, whether this is in the form of cross-country evidence, informal policy notes, or specialized advisory services. In this case, it is against this background that the Bank and its shareholders are grappling with the question of how best to combine and leverage its knowledge capabilities along with its financial resources. HKS Case Number 1936.0

Case Authors : Donald Oppenheimer, Laurence Prusak

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Decision making, Knowledge management, Leadership

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Knowledge Management at the World Bank Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10005056)	-10005056	-	-
Year 1	3466496	-6538560	3466496	0.9434	3270279
Year 2	3963046	-2575514	7429542	0.89	3527097
Year 3	3939522	1364008	11369064	0.8396	3307699
Year 4	3244294	4608302	14613358	0.7921	2569785
TOTAL			14613358		12674859

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2669803

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Knowledge Bank shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Knowledge Bank have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Knowledge Management at the World Bank

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Knowledge Bank often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Knowledge Bank needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10005056)	-10005056	-	-
Year 1	3466496	-6538560	3466496	0.8696	3014344
Year 2	3963046	-2575514	7429542	0.7561	2996632
Year 3	3939522	1364008	11369064	0.6575	2590300
Year 4	3244294	4608302	14613358	0.5718	1854936
TOTAL					10456212

The Net NPV after 4 years is 451156

(10456212 - 10005056 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10005056)	-10005056	-	-
Year 1	3466496	-6538560	3466496	0.8333	2888747
Year 2	3963046	-2575514	7429542	0.6944	2752115
Year 3	3939522	1364008	11369064	0.5787	2279816
Year 4	3244294	4608302	14613358	0.4823	1564571
TOTAL					9485249

The Net NPV after 4 years is -519807

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9485249 - 10005056 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Knowledge Bank to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Knowledge Bank has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Knowledge Bank can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Knowledge Bank, then the stock price of the Knowledge Bank should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Knowledge Bank should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Knowledge Management at the World Bank

References & Further Readings

Donald Oppenheimer, Laurence Prusak (2018), "Knowledge Management at the World Bank Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.