×




Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Pete Zimmerman, Pamela Varley. The Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School (referred as “Domenech Tj” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Communication, Diversity.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School Case Study


In this executive leadership case, the activist superintendent of Virginia's affluent Fairfax County public school district, Daniel A. Domenech, is faced with a complex, politically-loaded policy dilemma. At issue is admissions policy for the county's popular and prestigious magnet high school, the Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJ). TJ is so highly sought-after that only one in six applicants is accepted. The case is set in 2001. In the past 16 years, the admissions policy at TJ has made a pendulum swing: heavy reliance on a single standardized exam in 1985; the addition of an affirmative action program in 1990; the elimination of that program in 1998, in the face of political pressure and anxiety over a "reverse discrimination" law suit. As the case opens, TJ is fast losing diversity. The liberal-leaning School Board has instructed Domenech to come up with a way to restore that diversity, but without sacrificing the school's strong academic reputation or making the school system legally vulnerable. After painstaking effort, Domenech and his administrative team have come up with a plan that aims at geographic diversity within the county, rather than racial and ethnic diversity per se. But, faced with an angry reaction from parents from the "overrepresented" neighborhoods, the Board has quickly backed away from the plan. That leaves Domenech back at square one, trying to find a solution that will broaden the range of students at Jefferson in a way that is fair, effective, and legally safe-but also politically palatable.


Case Authors : Pete Zimmerman, Pamela Varley

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Communication, Diversity




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029646) -10029646 - -
Year 1 3468975 -6560671 3468975 0.9434 3272618
Year 2 3961997 -2598674 7430972 0.89 3526163
Year 3 3953126 1354452 11384098 0.8396 3319121
Year 4 3223793 4578245 14607891 0.7921 2553546
TOTAL 14607891 12671448




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641802

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Domenech Tj shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Domenech Tj have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Domenech Tj often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Domenech Tj needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029646) -10029646 - -
Year 1 3468975 -6560671 3468975 0.8696 3016500
Year 2 3961997 -2598674 7430972 0.7561 2995839
Year 3 3953126 1354452 11384098 0.6575 2599245
Year 4 3223793 4578245 14607891 0.5718 1843214
TOTAL 10454798


The Net NPV after 4 years is 425152

(10454798 - 10029646 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029646) -10029646 - -
Year 1 3468975 -6560671 3468975 0.8333 2890813
Year 2 3961997 -2598674 7430972 0.6944 2751387
Year 3 3953126 1354452 11384098 0.5787 2287689
Year 4 3223793 4578245 14607891 0.4823 1554684
TOTAL 9484572


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545074

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484572 - 10029646 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Domenech Tj to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Domenech Tj has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Domenech Tj can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Domenech Tj, then the stock price of the Domenech Tj should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Domenech Tj should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School

References & Further Readings

Pete Zimmerman, Pamela Varley (2018), "Values in Conflict: The Furor over Admissions Policy at a Popular Virginia Magnet School Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Py Refractories A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Pomifrutas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops


Qh Gelatin A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Noritake Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Golden Arrow SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Baiksan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


SPIC Yuanda SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Blackrock World Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Sano SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.