Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Steve Kelman, Kirsten Lundberg, Carol Chetkovich, David Lazer. The Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (referred as “Complaints Backlog” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Demographics, Economy, Government, Leadership, Project management, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Case Study

The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the agency charged with investigation of non-criminal complaints of civil rights-related violations in the U.S. workplace, including racial and gender discrimination. This case describes the agency's efforts to reform its internal procedures do as to deal with a staggering backlog of complaints--nearly 100,000--and up to 19-month waits for resolution. It focuses on key strategic decisions which must set the stage for greater efficiency--particularly the issue of whether every complaint must be processed in the same manner, of whether the agency should find ways to concentrate its effort on complaints judged somehow to be more significant. HKS Case Number 1562.0

Case Authors : Steve Kelman, Kirsten Lundberg, Carol Chetkovich, David Lazer

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Demographics, Economy, Government, Leadership, Project management, Strategic planning

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001083)	-10001083	-	-
Year 1	3460697	-6540386	3460697	0.9434	3264808
Year 2	3973982	-2566404	7434679	0.89	3536830
Year 3	3955164	1388760	11389843	0.8396	3320832
Year 4	3239794	4628554	14629637	0.7921	2566220
TOTAL			14629637		12688691

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2687608

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Complaints Backlog have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Complaints Backlog shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Complaints Backlog often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Complaints Backlog needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001083)	-10001083	-	-
Year 1	3460697	-6540386	3460697	0.8696	3009302
Year 2	3973982	-2566404	7434679	0.7561	3004901
Year 3	3955164	1388760	11389843	0.6575	2600585
Year 4	3239794	4628554	14629637	0.5718	1852363
TOTAL					10467150

The Net NPV after 4 years is 466067

(10467150 - 10001083 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001083)	-10001083	-	-
Year 1	3460697	-6540386	3460697	0.8333	2883914
Year 2	3973982	-2566404	7434679	0.6944	2759710
Year 3	3955164	1388760	11389843	0.5787	2288868
Year 4	3239794	4628554	14629637	0.4823	1562401
TOTAL					9494893

The Net NPV after 4 years is -506190

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494893 - 10001083 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Complaints Backlog to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Complaints Backlog has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Complaints Backlog can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Complaints Backlog, then the stock price of the Complaints Backlog should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Complaints Backlog should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

References & Further Readings

Steve Kelman, Kirsten Lundberg, Carol Chetkovich, David Lazer (2018), "Reducing the Complaints Backlog at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.