Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mihir A. Desai, Julia D. Stevens. The Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund (referred as “Conservation Biodiversity” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Emerging markets, Financial management, Government, Project management, Social enterprise, Social responsibility, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund Case Study

This case is available in only hard copy format (HBP does not have digital distribution rights to the content). As a result, a digital Educator Copy of the case is not available through this web site.The Global Conservation Fund is an international nonprofit organization with a $100 million endowment and an exclusive focus on land preservation. The fund and its director must decide which projects to fund over the next year and what financing mechanism to use. Describes the fund's efforts to develop a rating system for projects and various financing options used by conservation organizations, including debt-for-nature swaps, carbon credits, and conservation trust funds. Teaching purpose: To evaluate alternative projects in a nonprofit setting and to consider alternative financial instruments to advance biodiversity conservation.

Case Authors : Mihir A. Desai, Julia D. Stevens

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Emerging markets, Financial management, Government, Project management, Social enterprise, Social responsibility, Sustainability

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015264)	-10015264	-	-
Year 1	3471305	-6543959	3471305	0.9434	3274816
Year 2	3954107	-2589852	7425412	0.89	3519141
Year 3	3945622	1355770	11371034	0.8396	3312820
Year 4	3231534	4587304	14602568	0.7921	2559678
TOTAL			14602568		12666455

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651191

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Conservation Biodiversity shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Conservation Biodiversity have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Conservation Biodiversity often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Conservation Biodiversity needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015264)	-10015264	-	-
Year 1	3471305	-6543959	3471305	0.8696	3018526
Year 2	3954107	-2589852	7425412	0.7561	2989873
Year 3	3945622	1355770	11371034	0.6575	2594311
Year 4	3231534	4587304	14602568	0.5718	1847640
TOTAL					10450350

The Net NPV after 4 years is 435086

(10450350 - 10015264 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015264)	-10015264	-	-
Year 1	3471305	-6543959	3471305	0.8333	2892754
Year 2	3954107	-2589852	7425412	0.6944	2745908
Year 3	3945622	1355770	11371034	0.5787	2283346
Year 4	3231534	4587304	14602568	0.4823	1558417
TOTAL					9480425

The Net NPV after 4 years is -534839

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480425 - 10015264 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Conservation Biodiversity to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Conservation Biodiversity has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Conservation Biodiversity can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Conservation Biodiversity, then the stock price of the Conservation Biodiversity should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Conservation Biodiversity should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund

References & Further Readings

Mihir A. Desai, Julia D. Stevens (2018), "Financing Biodiversity Conservation by the Global Conservation Fund Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.