×




When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Henry P. Sims Jr., Samer Faraj, Seokhwa Yun. The When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership (referred as “Situational Leadership” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Leadership development, Motivating people, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment




Case Description of When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership Case Study


A situational theory of leadership attempts to match a particular leadership style or type to specific external circumstances. The general idea is that one type of leadership will be effective in one situation, but a different type of leadership will be effective in another situation. Historically, situational theories of leadership have been too abstract to apply to specific situations. Nevertheless, the concept of situational leadership retains considerable intuitive appeal. In this article we draw on our previous research about situational leadership during resuscitation in a trauma center, in order to derive a general strategy of how a leader can best develop his or her own personal theory of leadership which best works for their unique circumstances. The core of the strategic approach involves: (1) defining goals for a specific situation, (2) defining potential leadership types, (3) identifying situational conditions, (4) matching a leadership style to the particular situation, and (5) determining how the match between leadership style and situation will be made. The medical trauma center we profile provided an interesting example of how leaders considered elements of the situation to guide their own leadership.


Case Authors : Henry P. Sims Jr., Samer Faraj, Seokhwa Yun

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership, Leadership development, Motivating people, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3471560 -6541345 3471560 0.9434 3275057
Year 2 3979698 -2561647 7451258 0.89 3541917
Year 3 3953721 1392074 11404979 0.8396 3319620
Year 4 3222862 4614936 14627841 0.7921 2552809
TOTAL 14627841 12689403


The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676498

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Situational Leadership have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Situational Leadership shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.




Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Situational Leadership often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Situational Leadership needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3471560 -6541345 3471560 0.8696 3018748
Year 2 3979698 -2561647 7451258 0.7561 3009223
Year 3 3953721 1392074 11404979 0.6575 2599636
Year 4 3222862 4614936 14627841 0.5718 1842682
TOTAL 10470289


The Net NPV after 4 years is 457384

(10470289 - 10012905 )






Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3471560 -6541345 3471560 0.8333 2892967
Year 2 3979698 -2561647 7451258 0.6944 2763679
Year 3 3953721 1392074 11404979 0.5787 2288033
Year 4 3222862 4614936 14627841 0.4823 1554235
TOTAL 9498914


The Net NPV after 4 years is -513991

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498914 - 10012905 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Situational Leadership to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.



Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Situational Leadership has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Situational Leadership can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Situational Leadership, then the stock price of the Situational Leadership should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Situational Leadership should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.




References & Further Readings

Henry P. Sims Jr., Samer Faraj, Seokhwa Yun (2018), "When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.