×




Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Francesca Gino, Bradley R. Staats. The Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century (referred as “Tillman Caroline” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Labor, Leadership development, Motivating people, Performance measurement, Talent management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century Case Study


This case investigates both micro and macro issues around strategic human capital development. First, it explores how Egon Zehnder, a leading global search and advisory firm, assesses talent in the firms for which it works. The case discusses the deployment of a unique potential model that substantially shifts how the company views individuals. Within this framework, Mary Caroline Tillman, the case protagonist, is faced with an evaluation decision between two candidates who have different competencies, past experience and potential. Second, the case also explores the macro issues of running a professional services firm. The case presents an opportunity to examine how and if the organization can change its focus to include more assessment opportunities.


Case Authors : Francesca Gino, Bradley R. Staats

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Labor, Leadership development, Motivating people, Performance measurement, Talent management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025776) -10025776 - -
Year 1 3466192 -6559584 3466192 0.9434 3269992
Year 2 3956439 -2603145 7422631 0.89 3521217
Year 3 3945520 1342375 11368151 0.8396 3312735
Year 4 3235239 4577614 14603390 0.7921 2562612
TOTAL 14603390 12666556




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2640780

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tillman Caroline shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tillman Caroline have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tillman Caroline often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tillman Caroline needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025776) -10025776 - -
Year 1 3466192 -6559584 3466192 0.8696 3014080
Year 2 3956439 -2603145 7422631 0.7561 2991636
Year 3 3945520 1342375 11368151 0.6575 2594243
Year 4 3235239 4577614 14603390 0.5718 1849758
TOTAL 10449718


The Net NPV after 4 years is 423942

(10449718 - 10025776 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025776) -10025776 - -
Year 1 3466192 -6559584 3466192 0.8333 2888493
Year 2 3956439 -2603145 7422631 0.6944 2747527
Year 3 3945520 1342375 11368151 0.5787 2283287
Year 4 3235239 4577614 14603390 0.4823 1560204
TOTAL 9479511


The Net NPV after 4 years is -546265

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9479511 - 10025776 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tillman Caroline to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tillman Caroline has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tillman Caroline can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tillman Caroline, then the stock price of the Tillman Caroline should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tillman Caroline should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century

References & Further Readings

Francesca Gino, Bradley R. Staats (2018), "Mary Caroline Tillman at Egon Zehnder: Spotting Talent in the 21st Century Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


PARKSON Retail SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


Knoll SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Tianjin Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


New Look Vision SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


ITmedia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Unipol Gruppo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Techcomp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Liugong A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Olam SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing