×




Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Shalie Gaskill. The Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company (referred as “Box Levie” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company Case Study


CEO Aaron Levie co-founded Box as a student at USC in 2004. Less than 10 years later, Box had become one of the fastest growing enterprise software companies in Silicon Valley, serving more than 180,000 businesses including marquee customers such as Procter and Gamble, Panasonic, and Avaya. Despite this success, Levie was concerned about the future. He and his leadership team would need to overcome significant hurdles to turn Box into one of the next great enterprise software companies. This case explores how Levie planned to evolve Box from online storage to a data platform in the cloud. It follows the company's attempt to shift from collaborative sharing of information to becoming a platform for accessing critical data. Issues covered include: managing competitive threats from large, well-funded companies such as Microsoft and Citrix, delivering enterprise-class solutions with consumer-grade ease-of-use, and maintaining Box's distinctive and fun culture as the company grew and added more disciplined business processes.


Case Authors : Robert Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Shalie Gaskill

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025111) -10025111 - -
Year 1 3449520 -6575591 3449520 0.9434 3254264
Year 2 3974158 -2601433 7423678 0.89 3536986
Year 3 3960050 1358617 11383728 0.8396 3324934
Year 4 3246507 4605124 14630235 0.7921 2571538
TOTAL 14630235 12687723




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2662612

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Box Levie have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Box Levie shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Box Levie often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Box Levie needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025111) -10025111 - -
Year 1 3449520 -6575591 3449520 0.8696 2999583
Year 2 3974158 -2601433 7423678 0.7561 3005034
Year 3 3960050 1358617 11383728 0.6575 2603797
Year 4 3246507 4605124 14630235 0.5718 1856201
TOTAL 10464615


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439504

(10464615 - 10025111 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025111) -10025111 - -
Year 1 3449520 -6575591 3449520 0.8333 2874600
Year 2 3974158 -2601433 7423678 0.6944 2759832
Year 3 3960050 1358617 11383728 0.5787 2291696
Year 4 3246507 4605124 14630235 0.4823 1565638
TOTAL 9491766


The Net NPV after 4 years is -533345

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491766 - 10025111 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Box Levie to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Box Levie has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Box Levie can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Box Levie, then the stock price of the Box Levie should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Box Levie should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company

References & Further Readings

Robert Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Shalie Gaskill (2018), "Box: Building the Next Generation Enterprise Software Company Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Donaldson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Huafu Melange A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Sarawak Consolidated Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Abitare In SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Amorepacific Pref SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Prodways SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Bothwin Invest A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


C2E Energy Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Zhejiang Guyuelongshan Shaoxing Wine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)