×




MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Amit Gupta, Amita Joseph. The MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining (referred as “Baldota Mspl” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Organizational culture, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining Case Study


MSPL Limited was an iron ore mining and processing company in India. Owned by the Baldota Group, it also had interests in shipping, pelleting, and wind energy. In January 2012, MSPL's businesses and operations were headed by Narendrakumar A. Baldota and his two sons. MSPL's main source of revenue, the Vyasankere Iron Ore Mine (VIOM), was one of the largest iron ore mines in the private sector in India. MSPL had been progressive and proactive in its approach to sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Many of its initiatives predated government legislation related to environmental, employee, and community issues. MSPL's policies towards environmental issues and local communities had been driven by the beliefs and vision of its founder and chairman, Baldota's father. Baldota expanded MSPL's initiatives related to the environment, employees, and communities. The case deals with the choices and decisions that Baldota had made regarding the numerous CSR and sustainability initiatives undertaken by the organization. Were there other initiatives that MSPL should have undertaken? Was it even necessary for the company to carry out CSR activities in the local communities?


Case Authors : Amit Gupta, Amita Joseph

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Organizational culture, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012167) -10012167 - -
Year 1 3468491 -6543676 3468491 0.9434 3272161
Year 2 3965093 -2578583 7433584 0.89 3528919
Year 3 3966804 1388221 11400388 0.8396 3330605
Year 4 3232804 4621025 14633192 0.7921 2560684
TOTAL 14633192 12692369




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2680202

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Baldota Mspl shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Baldota Mspl have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Baldota Mspl often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Baldota Mspl needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012167) -10012167 - -
Year 1 3468491 -6543676 3468491 0.8696 3016079
Year 2 3965093 -2578583 7433584 0.7561 2998180
Year 3 3966804 1388221 11400388 0.6575 2608238
Year 4 3232804 4621025 14633192 0.5718 1848366
TOTAL 10470863


The Net NPV after 4 years is 458696

(10470863 - 10012167 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012167) -10012167 - -
Year 1 3468491 -6543676 3468491 0.8333 2890409
Year 2 3965093 -2578583 7433584 0.6944 2753537
Year 3 3966804 1388221 11400388 0.5787 2295604
Year 4 3232804 4621025 14633192 0.4823 1559030
TOTAL 9498580


The Net NPV after 4 years is -513587

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498580 - 10012167 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Baldota Mspl to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Baldota Mspl has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Baldota Mspl can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Baldota Mspl, then the stock price of the Baldota Mspl should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Baldota Mspl should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining

References & Further Readings

Amit Gupta, Amita Joseph (2018), "MSPL Limited: CSR and Sustainability in Mining Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Shanghai Industrial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Shaoneng A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


JSB Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Tianhe Chemicals Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Jiangsu Jiangnan Fiber SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Wijaya Karya Beton SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Avanti SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Arad Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services