×




Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by M. Ronald Buckley, Maria Riaz Hamdani. The Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation (referred as “Diversity Workplace” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Diversity.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation Case Study


While diversity has enjoyed significant popularity in the corporate world for the last two decades, researchers continue to put forward conflicting results regarding the business benefits of workplace diversity. Some say workplace diversity is good for businesses; others argue it is an undertaking full of challenges; and, yet others assert that it doesn't really matter. With this in mind, we attempted to synthesize the research that evaluates the impact of workplace diversity on the organizational bottom line. We find an over-emphasis on demonstrating the business case of diversity in economic denominations, which-to some extent-has limited our understanding of the complex dynamics associated with diversity. We identify a lack of attention toward institutional forces as one of the reasons that has restricted our focus on mere economic gains. Overall, we recommend broadening our definition of goals that organizations have when adopting diversity initiatives by including 'gain of legitimacy' and 'creation of goodwill' as part of the essential consequences of diversity programs.


Case Authors : M. Ronald Buckley, Maria Riaz Hamdani

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Diversity




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006630) -10006630 - -
Year 1 3472571 -6534059 3472571 0.9434 3276010
Year 2 3971880 -2562179 7444451 0.89 3534959
Year 3 3962887 1400708 11407338 0.8396 3327316
Year 4 3224286 4624994 14631624 0.7921 2553937
TOTAL 14631624 12692222




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685592

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Diversity Workplace shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Diversity Workplace have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Diversity Workplace often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Diversity Workplace needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006630) -10006630 - -
Year 1 3472571 -6534059 3472571 0.8696 3019627
Year 2 3971880 -2562179 7444451 0.7561 3003312
Year 3 3962887 1400708 11407338 0.6575 2605663
Year 4 3224286 4624994 14631624 0.5718 1843496
TOTAL 10472097


The Net NPV after 4 years is 465467

(10472097 - 10006630 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006630) -10006630 - -
Year 1 3472571 -6534059 3472571 0.8333 2893809
Year 2 3971880 -2562179 7444451 0.6944 2758250
Year 3 3962887 1400708 11407338 0.5787 2293337
Year 4 3224286 4624994 14631624 0.4823 1554922
TOTAL 9500318


The Net NPV after 4 years is -506312

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9500318 - 10006630 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Diversity Workplace to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Diversity Workplace has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Diversity Workplace can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Diversity Workplace, then the stock price of the Diversity Workplace should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Diversity Workplace should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation

References & Further Readings

M. Ronald Buckley, Maria Riaz Hamdani (2018), "Diversity Goals: Reframing the Debate and Enabling a Fair Evaluation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Vivendi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Telecom Italia ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Embelton Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Mediterranean Towers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Seojin Automotive SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Louis Vuitton SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Good Vibrations Shoes SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


VSTECS SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Hardware