Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Irene Gordon, Karel Hrazdil, Daniel Shapiro. The Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies (referred as “Governance Firms” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies Case Study

Most evidence regarding the determinants and effects of corporate governance practices is based on large firms. Herein, we explore these issues in the context of small publicly traded Canadian companies. We exploit the fact that such firms were not subject to corporate governance guidelines prior to 2005 and thus analyze the determinants of voluntary governance practice choices, as well as the effects of those practices on firm performance. Using a unique data set, we construct a corporate governance index for each firm. We measure performance by two variables: quality of accounting earnings and financial performance. The results indicate that corporate governance does matter for smaller traded Canadian firms. We find that both accounting and financial performance are positively related to corporate governance; however, their underlying mechanisms may differ somewhat. Given this result, it would be natural to expect all firms to choose higher levels of governance. However, our results also suggest small firms face resource constraints that limit their choices. We conclude that good governance is an important driver of small firm performance that cannot be neglected by the owners and managers of these firms.

Case Authors : Irene Gordon, Karel Hrazdil, Daniel Shapiro

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : International business

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010853)	-10010853	-	-
Year 1	3452092	-6558761	3452092	0.9434	3256691
Year 2	3971298	-2587463	7423390	0.89	3534441
Year 3	3941961	1354498	11365351	0.8396	3309746
Year 4	3227962	4582460	14593313	0.7921	2556848
TOTAL			14593313		12657726

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2646873

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Governance Firms have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Governance Firms shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Governance Firms often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Governance Firms needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010853)	-10010853	-	-
Year 1	3452092	-6558761	3452092	0.8696	3001819
Year 2	3971298	-2587463	7423390	0.7561	3002872
Year 3	3941961	1354498	11365351	0.6575	2591903
Year 4	3227962	4582460	14593313	0.5718	1845598
TOTAL					10442192

The Net NPV after 4 years is 431339

(10442192 - 10010853 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010853)	-10010853	-	-
Year 1	3452092	-6558761	3452092	0.8333	2876743
Year 2	3971298	-2587463	7423390	0.6944	2757846
Year 3	3941961	1354498	11365351	0.5787	2281227
Year 4	3227962	4582460	14593313	0.4823	1556695
TOTAL					9472511

The Net NPV after 4 years is -538342

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9472511 - 10010853 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Governance Firms to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Governance Firms has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Governance Firms can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Governance Firms, then the stock price of the Governance Firms should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Governance Firms should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies

References & Further Readings

Irene Gordon, Karel Hrazdil, Daniel Shapiro (2018), "Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Small Firms: A Study of Canadian Venture Exchange Companies Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.