×




Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Daina Mazutis, John Weeks, Luis Vivanco, Ivy Buche. The Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry (referred as “Airlines Singapore” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Market research.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry Case Study


Supplement to case IMD724. Singapore Airlines creates a partnership with India's Tata Group to create a full-service airline to serve the Indian market. The market is served by five existing airlines in both the low-cost and full-service categories. In parallel to the company it is creating with Singapore Airlines, the Tata Group is also launching a low-cost carrier with Malaysia's AirAsia, the overall Asian LCC leader. The case looks at how the different carriers compete in the Indian market, drawing differences between the approaches of low-cost carriers and full-service providers. Learning objectives: To identify and understand the different ways in which a company can compete in a market - low cost vs. differentiation. To understand the close link between strategic positioning and internal competencies.


Case Authors : Daina Mazutis, John Weeks, Luis Vivanco, Ivy Buche

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Market research




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015192) -10015192 - -
Year 1 3457210 -6557982 3457210 0.9434 3261519
Year 2 3962237 -2595745 7419447 0.89 3526377
Year 3 3967656 1371911 11387103 0.8396 3331320
Year 4 3249364 4621275 14636467 0.7921 2573801
TOTAL 14636467 12693017




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677825

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Airlines Singapore have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Airlines Singapore shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Airlines Singapore often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Airlines Singapore needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015192) -10015192 - -
Year 1 3457210 -6557982 3457210 0.8696 3006270
Year 2 3962237 -2595745 7419447 0.7561 2996020
Year 3 3967656 1371911 11387103 0.6575 2608798
Year 4 3249364 4621275 14636467 0.5718 1857834
TOTAL 10468923


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453731

(10468923 - 10015192 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015192) -10015192 - -
Year 1 3457210 -6557982 3457210 0.8333 2881008
Year 2 3962237 -2595745 7419447 0.6944 2751553
Year 3 3967656 1371911 11387103 0.5787 2296097
Year 4 3249364 4621275 14636467 0.4823 1567016
TOTAL 9495675


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519517

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495675 - 10015192 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Airlines Singapore to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Airlines Singapore has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Airlines Singapore can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Airlines Singapore, then the stock price of the Airlines Singapore should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Airlines Singapore should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry

References & Further Readings

Daina Mazutis, John Weeks, Luis Vivanco, Ivy Buche (2018), "Singapore Airlines (B): Strategic Positioning in the Indian Airline Industry Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Attis Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Wee Hur Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Legrand SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Banca Generali SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


General Moly SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Zenkoku Hosho SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Siloam International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Life Stem Genetics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Founder Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Hardware