IL FS Investment Managers (ILFS) Shared Leadership/ MBA Resources

Introduction to Shared Leadership

Shared Leadership for IL FS Investment Managers (India)

Given the rate of change and rate of disruptions in Investment Services industry, does the concept of shared leadership at the top / co-ceo makes sense for IL FS Investment Managers? A number of organizations especially sports organizations have taken lead in shared responsibilities at the top. We at Oak Spring University believe that IL FS Investment Managers can explore Shared Leadership at the top model to streamline operations, build and execute comprehensive strategic goals, and deliver higher returns to the shareholders.

As IL FS Investment Managers is operating in highly VUCA – volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous - environment, it needs to be an agile organization. Co-CEO / shared leadership model can help IL FS Investment Managers in Investment Services to better manage uncertainty and ambiguity arising out of – cloud computing is disrupting traditional business models, regulatory requirements, advancements in technology, geo-political development , technology based disruptions, supply chain disruptions, climate change, environmental laws, wage bills increases, etc

12 Hrs

per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

Shared Leaderhsip Characteristics and Requirements for IL FS Investment Managers

Fully shared accountability

It sounds obvious that both CEO must be accountable for the overall performance, but it is rarely the case in real life. Once the performance is not up to the goals set then it can chain start the process of accountability deflection within the organization. Secondly from the compensation perspective, both the CEOs should be compensated equally by IL FS Investment Managers.

Willing participants

Shared leadership / Co-CEO model at IL FS Investment Managers requires willing partners, who want to share the responsibilities and accountabilities at the top. The team based approach at the top will require leaders – an ability compromise more and ability to communicate effectively. Certainly the co-leadership model fails when one partner is willing to dominate the overall process. Secondly if both the leaders have vastly different personalities then the shared leadership model won’t survive for long.

Board support

Shared leadership is fast developing into an accepted practice among highly complex industries. In various other industries it not only requires the buy-in from the employees but also at the board level. The board of directors play a critical role in setting up the common objectives of the organization. As co-CEOs are responsible to execute on those goals, they need complete support of the board. The board also needs to act both as a facilitator and as a conflict resolution body for strategic questions.

An appearance of unity

People at the organization are quick to identify differences, when the two CEO are having difference of opinion. This creates an environment of uncertainty, confusion, and indecision in the organization. To avoid uncertainty and present a common vision, leaders at IL FS Investment Managers need to have an appearance of unity even when personally they have difference of opinions.

Complimentary skill sets

One of the reasons why organizations like to have diverse teams is that diverse team members bring complimentary and diverse skill sets. The same applies for shared leadership at the top. Both leaders need to have complimentary skill sets so that they can provide a more comprehensive leadership to solve the challenges that the organization is facing in uncertain and ambiguous business environment in Investment Services industry

Mechanism for conflict resolution

Before starting with the shared leadership at the top, IL FS Investment Managers needs to put in place the conflict resolution mechanism. When there are multiple views at the top then conflict is bound to happen and organization needs to have a conflict resolution mechanism. For example at Oracle and SAP, co-ceo model is managed by a strong executive chairman who could step in to resolve conflict and provide focus.

Shared values

It is prudent to choose shared leadership among partners who have shared values and those values are consistent with the values of the organization. To succeed in a partnership, the co-CEOs need to have a relationship based on trust, respect, honesty, and willingness to compromise.

Clear responsibilities and decisions rights

Clear responsibilities and decision rights are both a science and art. Organization structure at IL FS Investment Managers can specify the areas of responsibilities and decision rights but the working relationship has to be built by the leaders themselves.

Exit Strategy

If IL FS Investment Managers choose the shared leadership at the top / co-CEO model then it also has to have an exit strategy post the current leadership stage. Shared leadership not only requires mutual understanding between the leaders at the top but it also requires changes in the organization structure and work process to achieve desired results. If the organization fails to succeed the shared leadership model with another shared leadership model then it has to have a clear exit strategy to make success of the CEO oriented current leadership model.


The era of single strong leader at the top is coming to an end because of increasing complexity, ambiguity and uncertainty in the business environment. Organization needs to look more and more toward shared leadership approach where co-CEO shares the burden or responsibilities and accountabilities. Installing two decision makers at the top can help the organization to manage complex situations such as industry wide disruption, build an agile organization that can respond to political changes, economic factors, social trends, and legal and environmental regulations.

--- ---

Mohenz SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials

Shenzhen Sinexcel Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls

Bio-Matrix Scientifi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies

RWE AG ST SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities

Kader SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products

Ryobi Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products

Tianhe Chemicals Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing

Luxchem Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing

Pizu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming

Avingtrans SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods