×




Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C)


Professor Kenneth Carpenter has received word that he has inadvertently offended one of his students. He is pondering a possible response.

Authors :: James L. Heskett, Tor Askild Aase Johannessen

Topics :: Leadership & Managing People

Tags :: , SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C)" written by James L. Heskett, Tor Askild Aase Johannessen includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Carpenter Kenneth facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, and Leadership & Managing People.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) casestudy better are - – digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, supply chains are disrupted by pandemic , increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, technology disruption, increasing energy prices, there is backlash against globalization, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Carpenter Kenneth, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Carpenter Kenneth operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Carpenter Kenneth
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Leadership & Managing People field.
4. Making a Leadership & Managing People topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Carpenter Kenneth




Strengths Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Carpenter Kenneth in Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) Harvard Business Review case study are -

High brand equity

– Carpenter Kenneth has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Carpenter Kenneth to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Diverse revenue streams

– Carpenter Kenneth is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Leadership & Managing People industry

– Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Carpenter Kenneth to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Leadership & Managing People industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Carpenter Kenneth to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Carpenter Kenneth has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Carpenter Kenneth in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

Strong track record of project management

– Carpenter Kenneth is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Ability to recruit top talent

– Carpenter Kenneth is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Innovation driven organization

– Carpenter Kenneth is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Carpenter Kenneth has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Carpenter Kenneth has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Carpenter Kenneth are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.

Learning organization

- Carpenter Kenneth is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Carpenter Kenneth is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Carpenter Kenneth has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.






Weaknesses Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) are -

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Carpenter Kenneth has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C), in the dynamic environment Carpenter Kenneth has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Carpenter Kenneth has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C), it seems that the employees of Carpenter Kenneth don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Carpenter Kenneth needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Carpenter Kenneth is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Leadership & Managing People segment. Carpenter Kenneth needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Carpenter Kenneth to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) HBR case study mentions - Carpenter Kenneth takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

High dependence on star products

– The top 2 products and services of the firm as mentioned in the Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) HBR case study still accounts for major business revenue. This dependence on star products in has resulted into insufficient focus on developing new products, even though Carpenter Kenneth has relatively successful track record of launching new products.

Need for greater diversity

– Carpenter Kenneth has taken concrete steps on diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the efforts so far has resulted in limited success. It needs to expand the recruitment and selection process to hire more people from the minorities and underprivileged background.

Slow decision making process

– As mentioned earlier in the report, Carpenter Kenneth has a very deliberative decision making approach. This approach has resulted in prudent decisions, but it has also resulted in missing opportunities in the industry over the last five years. Carpenter Kenneth even though has strong showing on digital transformation primary two stages, it has struggled to capitalize the power of digital transformation in marketing efforts and new venture efforts.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Carpenter Kenneth, firm in the HBR case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C), is just above the industry average. Carpenter Kenneth needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.




Opportunities Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) are -

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Carpenter Kenneth has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Carpenter Kenneth to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) case study. Carpenter Kenneth can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Carpenter Kenneth can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Carpenter Kenneth operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Leadership & Managing People sector.

Developing new processes and practices

– Carpenter Kenneth can develop new processes and procedures in Leadership & Managing People industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.

Manufacturing automation

– Carpenter Kenneth can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Leadership & Managing People segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Carpenter Kenneth can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Carpenter Kenneth can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Carpenter Kenneth can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Carpenter Kenneth to increase its market reach. Carpenter Kenneth will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Buying journey improvements

– Carpenter Kenneth can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Carpenter Kenneth to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Carpenter Kenneth is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Carpenter Kenneth can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Leadership & Managing People segment.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Carpenter Kenneth has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Carpenter Kenneth to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.




Threats Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) are -

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C), Carpenter Kenneth may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Leadership & Managing People .

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Regulatory challenges

– Carpenter Kenneth needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Leadership & Managing People industry regulations.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Leadership & Managing People field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Carpenter Kenneth can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Carpenter Kenneth high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Environmental challenges

– Carpenter Kenneth needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Carpenter Kenneth can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Leadership & Managing People industry.

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Carpenter Kenneth needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Leadership & Managing People industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

Increasing wage structure of Carpenter Kenneth

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Carpenter Kenneth.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Carpenter Kenneth in the Leadership & Managing People sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Carpenter Kenneth is facing in Leadership & Managing People sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Carpenter Kenneth has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Leadership & Managing People industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Carpenter Kenneth needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Leadership & Managing People sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Carpenter Kenneth can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Professors Sven Larson and Kenneth Carpenter (C) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Carpenter Kenneth needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Nedbank: Transformational Leadership in Sustainable Turnaround SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Caren Scheepers, Jabu Maphalala, Chantel van der Westhuizen , Leadership & Managing People


Project ACHIEVE: January 2000 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

H. Kent Bowen, Liz Kind , Technology & Operations


Intellectual Property Exchange (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Lynda M. Applegate, Gavin Clarkson , Technology & Operations


United Services Automobile Association (USAA) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael R. Vitale, Joyce J. Elam, John E.P. Morrison , Technology & Operations


Cavalier Hospital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael J. Schill, Kenan Yount , Finance & Accounting


Metapath Software: September 1997, Chinese Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

G. Felda Hardymon, Bill Wasik , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Syntonix Pharmaceuticals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Raymond M. Kinnunen, Susan F. Sieloff, Robert Young , Finance & Accounting