×




Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged)


A large restaurant chain undergoes a leveraged buyout and subsequent recapitalization. Financial and operating problems at the company force it to consider various restructuring options, including a prepackaged Chapter 11 exchange offer to its public bondholders. Two investment bankers hired by senior and junior creditors present competing company valuations to the bankruptcy court that differ by $700 million.

Authors :: Stuart C. Gilson

Topics :: Finance & Accounting

Tags :: Financial management, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged)" written by Stuart C. Gilson includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Flagstar Bondholders facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Financial management, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations and Finance & Accounting.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) casestudy better are - – geopolitical disruptions, wage bills are increasing, technology disruption, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, competitive advantages are harder to sustain because of technology dispersion, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, central banks are concerned over increasing inflation, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Flagstar Bondholders, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Flagstar Bondholders operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Flagstar Bondholders
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Finance & Accounting field.
4. Making a Finance & Accounting topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Flagstar Bondholders




Strengths Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Flagstar Bondholders in Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Harvard Business Review case study are -

Successful track record of launching new products

– Flagstar Bondholders has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Flagstar Bondholders has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Innovation driven organization

– Flagstar Bondholders is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Flagstar Bondholders has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Analytics focus

– Flagstar Bondholders is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Stuart C. Gilson can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Flagstar Bondholders has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Diverse revenue streams

– Flagstar Bondholders is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Flagstar Bondholders has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Ability to recruit top talent

– Flagstar Bondholders is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Finance & Accounting industry

– Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Flagstar Bondholders to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Finance & Accounting industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Flagstar Bondholders to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Strong track record of project management

– Flagstar Bondholders is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Training and development

– Flagstar Bondholders has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.






Weaknesses Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) are -

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Flagstar Bondholders supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged), it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Flagstar Bondholders vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged), it seems that the employees of Flagstar Bondholders don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Flagstar Bondholders has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged), in the dynamic environment Flagstar Bondholders has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Flagstar Bondholders has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Flagstar Bondholders has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Flagstar Bondholders is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Finance & Accounting segment. Flagstar Bondholders needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Flagstar Bondholders to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

High dependence on star products

– The top 2 products and services of the firm as mentioned in the Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) HBR case study still accounts for major business revenue. This dependence on star products in has resulted into insufficient focus on developing new products, even though Flagstar Bondholders has relatively successful track record of launching new products.

Lack of clear differentiation of Flagstar Bondholders products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Flagstar Bondholders needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Flagstar Bondholders, firm in the HBR case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, Stuart C. Gilson suggests that, Flagstar Bondholders is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Flagstar Bondholders is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.




Opportunities Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) are -

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Flagstar Bondholders can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Flagstar Bondholders operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Finance & Accounting sector.

Loyalty marketing

– Flagstar Bondholders has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Flagstar Bondholders in the consumer business. Now Flagstar Bondholders can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Flagstar Bondholders can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Flagstar Bondholders has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Flagstar Bondholders to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Finance & Accounting industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Flagstar Bondholders can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Flagstar Bondholders can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Flagstar Bondholders can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Flagstar Bondholders to increase its market reach. Flagstar Bondholders will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Flagstar Bondholders to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Flagstar Bondholders to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Flagstar Bondholders has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Flagstar Bondholders to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) case study. Flagstar Bondholders can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Flagstar Bondholders is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Flagstar Bondholders can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Developing new processes and practices

– Flagstar Bondholders can develop new processes and procedures in Finance & Accounting industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.




Threats Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) are -

Increasing wage structure of Flagstar Bondholders

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Flagstar Bondholders.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged), Flagstar Bondholders may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Finance & Accounting .

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Flagstar Bondholders has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Finance & Accounting industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Flagstar Bondholders needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Finance & Accounting sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Flagstar Bondholders business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Flagstar Bondholders can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Flagstar Bondholders can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) .

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Flagstar Bondholders in the Finance & Accounting sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Flagstar Bondholders.

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Flagstar Bondholders will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Flagstar Bondholders high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Environmental challenges

– Flagstar Bondholders needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Flagstar Bondholders can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Finance & Accounting industry.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Flagstar Bondholders with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Flagstar Bondholders needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

James K. Sebenius, Ellen Knebel , Strategy & Execution


Mercury Athletic: Valuing the Opportunity SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Timothy A. Luehrman, Joel L. Heilprin , Finance & Accounting


Roslin Institute SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ray A. Goldberg, Thomas M. Clay , Leadership & Managing People


Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

George Foster, Jason Luther , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


eBay Partner Network (C) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Benjamin Edelman, Ian I. Larkin , Strategy & Execution


Kreative Kasuals Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Elizabeth M.A. Grasby, Kevin Dean , Finance & Accounting