×




Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B)


While reading the Wall Street Journal, Edward Rogers notices an advertisement for a knowledge management architect at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. Rogers is an academic whose scholarship centers on developing models of how and why people cooperate intellectually. After submitting his resume and completing the interview process, Rogers is offered the position for a term appointment of three years. After one month on the job, Rogers wonders how he should proceed in helping the Goddard Space Flight Center become a learning organization. It is, in fact, the kind of opportunity Rogers has looked forward to for many years, but what will his plan of attack look like? How can he help this collection of rocket scientists work better together? In the B case, Rogers's action plan is presented, together with input from NASA engineers, scientists and other key players. See also the A case (UV3262).

Authors :: James G. Clawson, Gerry Yemen

Topics :: Organizational Development

Tags :: Government, Innovation, Organizational structure, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B)" written by James G. Clawson, Gerry Yemen includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Rogers Goddard facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Government, Innovation, Organizational structure and Organizational Development.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) casestudy better are - – increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, there is backlash against globalization, digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, geopolitical disruptions, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, central banks are concerned over increasing inflation, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, wage bills are increasing, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Rogers Goddard, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Rogers Goddard operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Rogers Goddard
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Organizational Development field.
4. Making a Organizational Development topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Rogers Goddard




Strengths Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Rogers Goddard in Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) Harvard Business Review case study are -

High brand equity

– Rogers Goddard has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Rogers Goddard to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Organizational Resilience of Rogers Goddard

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Rogers Goddard does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Rogers Goddard are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.

Ability to lead change in Organizational Development field

– Rogers Goddard is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Rogers Goddard in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Digital Transformation in Organizational Development segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Rogers Goddard digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Rogers Goddard has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Training and development

– Rogers Goddard has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Rogers Goddard has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Diverse revenue streams

– Rogers Goddard is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Analytics focus

– Rogers Goddard is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by James G. Clawson, Gerry Yemen can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Learning organization

- Rogers Goddard is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Rogers Goddard is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Rogers Goddard has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.






Weaknesses Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) are -

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Rogers Goddard has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Rogers Goddard needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B), it seems that the employees of Rogers Goddard don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B), it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Organizational Development strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, James G. Clawson, Gerry Yemen suggests that, Rogers Goddard is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Rogers Goddard supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B), it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Rogers Goddard vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Rogers Goddard, firm in the HBR case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Rogers Goddard 's lucrative customers.

Aligning sales with marketing

– It come across in the case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) that the firm needs to have more collaboration between its sales team and marketing team. Sales professionals in the industry have deep experience in developing customer relationships. Marketing department in the case Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) can leverage the sales team experience to cultivate customer relationships as Rogers Goddard is planning to shift buying processes online.

Products dominated business model

– Even though Rogers Goddard has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B), in the dynamic environment Rogers Goddard has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Rogers Goddard has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.




Opportunities Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) are -

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Rogers Goddard can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B), to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Rogers Goddard can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Buying journey improvements

– Rogers Goddard can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Developing new processes and practices

– Rogers Goddard can develop new processes and procedures in Organizational Development industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Rogers Goddard can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Rogers Goddard can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Organizational Development segment.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Organizational Development industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Rogers Goddard can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Rogers Goddard to increase its market reach. Rogers Goddard will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Organizational Development industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Rogers Goddard can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Rogers Goddard can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Manufacturing automation

– Rogers Goddard can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Organizational Development segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Rogers Goddard to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Rogers Goddard can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Rogers Goddard operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Organizational Development sector.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Rogers Goddard is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.




Threats Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) are -

Environmental challenges

– Rogers Goddard needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Rogers Goddard can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Organizational Development industry.

Regulatory challenges

– Rogers Goddard needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Organizational Development industry regulations.

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Rogers Goddard will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Rogers Goddard.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Rogers Goddard is facing in Organizational Development sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Rogers Goddard has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Organizational Development industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Rogers Goddard needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Organizational Development sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Rogers Goddard business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Rogers Goddard can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Rogers Goddard high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Rogers Goddard demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Rogers Goddard in the Organizational Development sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Goddard Space Flight Center: Building A Learning Organization (B) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Rogers Goddard needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Mindray Medical International Limited: Going Global from China SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Amitava Chattopadhyay, Dongsheng Zhou, Fang Wan , Sales & Marketing


Axel Springer in 2014: Strategic Leadership of the Digital Transformation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Robert Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Jason Luther , Leadership & Managing People


Historical Society of Pennsylvania SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Stephen A. Greyser, Stephanie Woerner , Global Business


PEPSI: The Indian Challenge SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Pankaj Ghemawat , Strategy & Execution


Retail Financial Services in 1998: Merrill Lynch SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Stephen P. Bradley, Takia Mahmood , Strategy & Execution


OTISLINE (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

F. Warren McFarlan, Donna B. Stoddard , Technology & Operations


Ann Hopkins (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Joseph L. Badaracco Jr., Ilyse Barkan , Leadership & Managing People


Advertising Experiments at RestaurantGrades SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael Luca, Weijia Dai, Hyunjin Kim , Communication