×




BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A)


Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP seeks to expand its assets and revenues, so it looks to Russia, but a planned alliance with a Russian state-owned oil company is thwarted by objections from another Russian oil partner. This case maps BP's strategic alliances and illustrates the importance of alliance management.

Authors :: Robert E. Spekman, Zuri Linetsky

Topics :: Sales & Marketing

Tags :: , SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A)" written by Robert E. Spekman, Zuri Linetsky includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Bp Oil facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, and Sales & Marketing.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) casestudy better are - – increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, geopolitical disruptions, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, competitive advantages are harder to sustain because of technology dispersion, there is backlash against globalization, cloud computing is disrupting traditional business models, digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, supply chains are disrupted by pandemic , etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Bp Oil, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Bp Oil operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Bp Oil
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Sales & Marketing field.
4. Making a Sales & Marketing topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Bp Oil




Strengths BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Bp Oil in BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) Harvard Business Review case study are -

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Bp Oil in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

Organizational Resilience of Bp Oil

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Bp Oil does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Analytics focus

– Bp Oil is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Robert E. Spekman, Zuri Linetsky can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Digital Transformation in Sales & Marketing segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Bp Oil digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Bp Oil has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Innovation driven organization

– Bp Oil is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Strong track record of project management

– Bp Oil is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Ability to recruit top talent

– Bp Oil is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Bp Oil has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Bp Oil has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Bp Oil has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Bp Oil has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Low bargaining power of suppliers

– Suppliers of Bp Oil in the sector have low bargaining power. BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) has further diversified its suppliers portfolio by building a robust supply chain across various countries. This helps Bp Oil to manage not only supply disruptions but also source products at highly competitive prices.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Bp Oil are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.






Weaknesses BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) are -

High dependence on star products

– The top 2 products and services of the firm as mentioned in the BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) HBR case study still accounts for major business revenue. This dependence on star products in has resulted into insufficient focus on developing new products, even though Bp Oil has relatively successful track record of launching new products.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) HBR case study mentions - Bp Oil takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Bp Oil needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

Products dominated business model

– Even though Bp Oil has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Bp Oil has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Bp Oil 's lucrative customers.

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Bp Oil is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Bp Oil supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A), it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Bp Oil vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Bp Oil has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Lack of clear differentiation of Bp Oil products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Bp Oil needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Bp Oil has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.




Opportunities BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) are -

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Bp Oil has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Bp Oil to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Bp Oil can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Bp Oil has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Bp Oil to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) case study. Bp Oil can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.

Loyalty marketing

– Bp Oil has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Bp Oil can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Developing new processes and practices

– Bp Oil can develop new processes and procedures in Sales & Marketing industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Bp Oil is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Sales & Marketing industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Bp Oil can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Bp Oil can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Bp Oil in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Sales & Marketing segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Bp Oil to increase its market reach. Bp Oil will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Buying journey improvements

– Bp Oil can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Bp Oil can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Sales & Marketing segment.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Bp Oil to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.




Threats BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) are -

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Bp Oil will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Bp Oil in the Sales & Marketing sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Bp Oil is facing in Sales & Marketing sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Bp Oil can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A), Bp Oil may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Sales & Marketing .

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Bp Oil in the Sales & Marketing industry. The Sales & Marketing industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Bp Oil needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Sales & Marketing industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

Increasing wage structure of Bp Oil

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Bp Oil.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Sales & Marketing field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Bp Oil can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Bp Oil with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Bp Oil business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Environmental challenges

– Bp Oil needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Bp Oil can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Sales & Marketing industry.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of BP in Russia: Bad Partners or Bad Partnerships? (A) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Bp Oil needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

teamLab: "Ultra-technologist" Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ian D Gow, Mayuka Yamazaki , Leadership & Managing People


Wooden Bakery: Should It Enter the U.S. Market? SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Hagop Panossian, Dima Jamali , Leadership & Managing People


Linux in 2004, Spanish Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Pankaj Ghemawat, Brian Subirana, Christina Pham , Technology & Operations


Innovation at Progressive (A): Pay-As-You-Go Insurance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Frances X. Frei, Hanna Rodriguez-Farrar , Technology & Operations


Valley-Wide Health Systems, Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Edward D. Hess , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Maiden in America SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Tom Nicholas , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Juice Guys (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Joseph B. Lassiter, Sharon Fox, Cindy Rushmore , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


FIJI Water: Carbon Negative? SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Francesca Gino, Michael W. Toffel, Stephanie van Sice , Sales & Marketing


Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup! SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Edward Gamble, Peter Moroz, Stewart Thornhill, Haley Beer , Strategy & Execution


The AS/AD Model SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Alfredo Pastor Bodmer , Global Business


Oklahoma VISION Project SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Lynda M. Applegate, Susan Saltrick , Innovation & Entrepreneurship