×




General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)


Describes the U.S. large turbine generator industry in early 1963, a period of severe price cutting and depressed industry conditions. Presents data to allow a structural analysis of the industry and an analysis of the strategies of the major players since 1946. The major teaching issue is the process of competitive rivalry in an oligopoly market, particularly the problems of deescalating in a situation of market warfare. This industry is one where the conditions for avoiding warfare are difficult. Subsidiary teaching issues include the structural analysis of capital goods markets and strategy for the market leader in areas like pricing, rate of technological change, and customer focus. After understanding the industry structure, the discussion should turn to what GE can do to extricate itself from the disastrous price cutting afflicting the industry.

Authors :: Michael E. Porter

Topics :: Strategy & Execution

Tags :: Change management, Competition, Customers, Financial markets, Pricing, Regulation, Technology, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)" written by Michael E. Porter includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Warfare Turbine facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Change management, Competition, Customers, Financial markets, Pricing, Regulation, Technology and Strategy & Execution.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) casestudy better are - – wage bills are increasing, central banks are concerned over increasing inflation, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, increasing transportation and logistics costs, digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, technology disruption, cloud computing is disrupting traditional business models, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Warfare Turbine, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Warfare Turbine operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Warfare Turbine
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Strategy & Execution field.
4. Making a Strategy & Execution topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Warfare Turbine




Strengths General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Warfare Turbine in General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) Harvard Business Review case study are -

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Warfare Turbine has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Ability to recruit top talent

– Warfare Turbine is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Low bargaining power of suppliers

– Suppliers of Warfare Turbine in the sector have low bargaining power. General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) has further diversified its suppliers portfolio by building a robust supply chain across various countries. This helps Warfare Turbine to manage not only supply disruptions but also source products at highly competitive prices.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Strong track record of project management

– Warfare Turbine is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Analytics focus

– Warfare Turbine is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Michael E. Porter can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Warfare Turbine has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Ability to lead change in Strategy & Execution field

– Warfare Turbine is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Warfare Turbine in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Diverse revenue streams

– Warfare Turbine is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

High brand equity

– Warfare Turbine has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Warfare Turbine to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Warfare Turbine has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Warfare Turbine has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Warfare Turbine has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.






Weaknesses General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) are -

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Warfare Turbine has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Warfare Turbine is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Strategy & Execution segment. Warfare Turbine needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Warfare Turbine to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A), in the dynamic environment Warfare Turbine has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Warfare Turbine has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Warfare Turbine has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Warfare Turbine has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Warfare Turbine needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, Michael E. Porter suggests that, Warfare Turbine is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Warfare Turbine is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A), it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Strategy & Execution strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) HBR case study mentions - Warfare Turbine takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

High dependence on star products

– The top 2 products and services of the firm as mentioned in the General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) HBR case study still accounts for major business revenue. This dependence on star products in has resulted into insufficient focus on developing new products, even though Warfare Turbine has relatively successful track record of launching new products.




Opportunities General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) are -

Leveraging digital technologies

– Warfare Turbine can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Warfare Turbine can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A), to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Strategy & Execution industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Warfare Turbine can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Warfare Turbine can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Warfare Turbine has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Warfare Turbine to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Warfare Turbine in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Strategy & Execution segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Warfare Turbine to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Warfare Turbine to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Warfare Turbine in the consumer business. Now Warfare Turbine can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Developing new processes and practices

– Warfare Turbine can develop new processes and procedures in Strategy & Execution industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Warfare Turbine can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Strategy & Execution segment.

Buying journey improvements

– Warfare Turbine can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Loyalty marketing

– Warfare Turbine has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Warfare Turbine can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Warfare Turbine operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Strategy & Execution sector.




Threats General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) are -

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Warfare Turbine in the Strategy & Execution industry. The Strategy & Execution industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Warfare Turbine is facing in Strategy & Execution sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Warfare Turbine will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Warfare Turbine demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Warfare Turbine needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Strategy & Execution industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Warfare Turbine.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Environmental challenges

– Warfare Turbine needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Warfare Turbine can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Strategy & Execution industry.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Warfare Turbine in the Strategy & Execution sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Warfare Turbine can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Strategy & Execution field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Warfare Turbine can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Warfare Turbine can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) .

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Warfare Turbine has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Strategy & Execution industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Warfare Turbine needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Strategy & Execution sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of General Electric vs. Westinghouse in Large Turbine Generators (A) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Warfare Turbine needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Bayer CropScience in India (B): Value-Driven Strategy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Satyajeet Subramanian, Charles Dhanaraj, Oana Branzei , Leadership & Managing People


PCAOB (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Lynn Sharp Paine, Kim Eric Bettcher , Finance & Accounting


Novo Nordisk (A): Global Coordination SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Joel Podolny, John Roberts, Aldo Kemper , Global Business


Lean Manufacturing at FCI (B): Deploying Lean at Nantong, China SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Cynthia Laumuno, Enver Yucesan , Leadership & Managing People


British Airways Hits Turbulence SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Jean-Francois Manzoni, Jean-Louis Barsoux , Organizational Development


David Neeleman: Flight Path of a Servant Leader (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

William W. George, Matthew D. Breitfelder , Leadership & Managing People


Aerobotics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Howie Rosen, Steve Ciesinski, Matthew Saucedo , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


AmTran Technology Ltd. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Willy Shih, Jyun-Cheng Wang, Karen Robinson , Strategy & Execution


Westinghouse Electric Corp.: Automating the Capital Budgeting Process (B2) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Lynda M. Applegate, Julie H. Hertenstein, Nicole Wishart, Mary Addonizio , Technology & Operations