×




Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology


This case presents the "best practices" of a highly successful post-merger integrator that grew from $400 million in 1997, to $1.5 billion in 2000, to $4 billion in 2002. Case focus is on the $4.0 billion IT sector of Northrop Grumman (NGIT), a company confronting immense change in the rapidly consolidating defense business. This integration is unique in that the product is a complete melding of various companies, systems, leaderships, and cultures of 11 legacy organizations. Not only is the result an organization with a new identity, but also one with new strategic capabilities unavailable to any of the stand-alone legacy companies. The case is accompanied by a CD-ROM that includes videos of weapons systems (e.g., B-2 bomber) and PowerPoint presentations of their PMI process.

Authors :: David Freccia, L.J. Bourgeois

Topics :: Strategy & Execution

Tags :: , SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology" written by David Freccia, L.J. Bourgeois includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Grumman Northrop facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, and Strategy & Execution.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology casestudy better are - – technology disruption, increasing energy prices, there is backlash against globalization, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, wage bills are increasing, increasing commodity prices, competitive advantages are harder to sustain because of technology dispersion, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, geopolitical disruptions, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Grumman Northrop, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Grumman Northrop operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Grumman Northrop
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Strategy & Execution field.
4. Making a Strategy & Execution topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Grumman Northrop




Strengths Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Grumman Northrop in Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology Harvard Business Review case study are -

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Strategy & Execution industry

– Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Grumman Northrop to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Strategy & Execution industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Grumman Northrop to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Digital Transformation in Strategy & Execution segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Grumman Northrop digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Grumman Northrop has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Innovation driven organization

– Grumman Northrop is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Strong track record of project management

– Grumman Northrop is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Grumman Northrop has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Diverse revenue streams

– Grumman Northrop is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Grumman Northrop has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Grumman Northrop has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Analytics focus

– Grumman Northrop is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by David Freccia, L.J. Bourgeois can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

High brand equity

– Grumman Northrop has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Grumman Northrop to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Grumman Northrop in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.






Weaknesses Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology are -

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Grumman Northrop has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Lack of clear differentiation of Grumman Northrop products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Grumman Northrop needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Grumman Northrop needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Grumman Northrop has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

High dependence on star products

– The top 2 products and services of the firm as mentioned in the Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology HBR case study still accounts for major business revenue. This dependence on star products in has resulted into insufficient focus on developing new products, even though Grumman Northrop has relatively successful track record of launching new products.

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Grumman Northrop is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, David Freccia, L.J. Bourgeois suggests that, Grumman Northrop is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Grumman Northrop, firm in the HBR case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology, is just above the industry average. Grumman Northrop needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Grumman Northrop is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Strategy & Execution segment. Grumman Northrop needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Grumman Northrop to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Strategy & Execution strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.




Opportunities Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology are -

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Strategy & Execution industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Grumman Northrop can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Strategy & Execution industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Grumman Northrop can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Grumman Northrop can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Grumman Northrop can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Grumman Northrop is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Grumman Northrop to increase its market reach. Grumman Northrop will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Grumman Northrop can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Grumman Northrop to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Grumman Northrop can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology, to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.

Manufacturing automation

– Grumman Northrop can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Strategy & Execution segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Grumman Northrop can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Grumman Northrop to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Grumman Northrop to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Buying journey improvements

– Grumman Northrop can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Loyalty marketing

– Grumman Northrop has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.




Threats Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology are -

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Grumman Northrop can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Grumman Northrop demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Grumman Northrop can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology .

Regulatory challenges

– Grumman Northrop needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Strategy & Execution industry regulations.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Strategy & Execution field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Grumman Northrop can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Grumman Northrop may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Strategy & Execution .

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Grumman Northrop is facing in Strategy & Execution sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Grumman Northrop with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.

Increasing wage structure of Grumman Northrop

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Grumman Northrop.

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Grumman Northrop in the Strategy & Execution industry. The Strategy & Execution industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Grumman Northrop will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Grumman Northrop.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Post-Merger Integration at Northrop Grumman Information Technology is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Grumman Northrop needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Donner Co., Spanish Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Roy D. Shapiro , Technology & Operations


Apple Computer (A): Corporate Strategy and Culture (Abridged) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael Beer, Gregory C. Rogers , Organizational Development


Khosla Ventures: Biofuels Gain Liquidity SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Joseph B. Lassiter, William A. Sahlman, Alison Berkley Wagonfeld, Evan Richardson , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Privatization of Anatolia National Telekom: BOW Confidential Instructions SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael D. Watkins, Banu Ozcan, Burkhard Schrage, Paul Vaaler , Strategy & Execution


Superior Manufacturing Co., Chinese Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

David F. Hawkins, Jacob Cohen, James W Culliton , Finance & Accounting


Mass Customization in Haifei Bus Company SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Zhiduan Xu, Tianyang Wang, Xiaowen Hu, Yan Lu , Technology & Operations


ABC Energy Limited: Culture and Formalization SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Pavitra Mishra, Rajen Gupta , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


OSI in China SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

David E. Bell, Mary Shelman , Strategy & Execution


Madison Avenue: Digital Media Services (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Steven J. Spear, Anne D. Karshis , Technology & Operations