×




Shared Decision Making SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Shared Decision Making


The Foundation for Informed Medical Decision-Making has created an interactive videodisc system that provides patients with customized support regarding medical treatment or screening decisions when they face a choice between two equally effective courses of action. The videodiscs, known as shared decision-making programs (SDPs), were the result of considering grant-funded research into treatment outcomes and patients' preferences concerning varying medical treatments. Over a six-year period, the foundation has partnered with a variety of commercial firms to manufacture and market the SDPs. Despite robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of the SDPs and the enthusiastic response of early purchasers, the foundation has been unable to widely disseminate the product and faces major debt.

Authors :: Richard Bohmer, Laura R. Feldman, Karen Sepucha

Topics :: Technology & Operations

Tags :: Entrepreneurship, Innovation, IT, Strategy execution, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Shared Decision Making" written by Richard Bohmer, Laura R. Feldman, Karen Sepucha includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Sdps Foundation facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Shared Decision Making case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, IT, Strategy execution and Technology & Operations.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Shared Decision Making casestudy better are - – banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, central banks are concerned over increasing inflation, there is backlash against globalization, technology disruption, competitive advantages are harder to sustain because of technology dispersion, there is increasing trade war between United States & China, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Shared Decision Making


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Shared Decision Making case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Sdps Foundation, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Sdps Foundation operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Shared Decision Making can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Shared Decision Making case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Sdps Foundation
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Technology & Operations field.
4. Making a Technology & Operations topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Sdps Foundation




Strengths Shared Decision Making | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Sdps Foundation in Shared Decision Making Harvard Business Review case study are -

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Shared Decision Making Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Ability to lead change in Technology & Operations field

– Sdps Foundation is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Sdps Foundation in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Sdps Foundation has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Sdps Foundation has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Diverse revenue streams

– Sdps Foundation is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Shared Decision Making case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Digital Transformation in Technology & Operations segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Sdps Foundation digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Sdps Foundation has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Analytics focus

– Sdps Foundation is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Richard Bohmer, Laura R. Feldman, Karen Sepucha can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Learning organization

- Sdps Foundation is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Sdps Foundation is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Shared Decision Making Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Sdps Foundation has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Shared Decision Making - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Training and development

– Sdps Foundation has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Shared Decision Making Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Sdps Foundation are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.

Strong track record of project management

– Sdps Foundation is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Sdps Foundation has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Shared Decision Making HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.






Weaknesses Shared Decision Making | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Shared Decision Making are -

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, Richard Bohmer, Laura R. Feldman, Karen Sepucha suggests that, Sdps Foundation is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Shared Decision Making, it seems that the employees of Sdps Foundation don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

High dependence on star products

– The top 2 products and services of the firm as mentioned in the Shared Decision Making HBR case study still accounts for major business revenue. This dependence on star products in has resulted into insufficient focus on developing new products, even though Sdps Foundation has relatively successful track record of launching new products.

Slow decision making process

– As mentioned earlier in the report, Sdps Foundation has a very deliberative decision making approach. This approach has resulted in prudent decisions, but it has also resulted in missing opportunities in the industry over the last five years. Sdps Foundation even though has strong showing on digital transformation primary two stages, it has struggled to capitalize the power of digital transformation in marketing efforts and new venture efforts.

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Sdps Foundation has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Sdps Foundation has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Sdps Foundation is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Technology & Operations segment. Sdps Foundation needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Sdps Foundation to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study Shared Decision Making has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Sdps Foundation 's lucrative customers.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Sdps Foundation has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Sdps Foundation is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study Shared Decision Making can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Sdps Foundation, firm in the HBR case study Shared Decision Making needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.




Opportunities Shared Decision Making | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Shared Decision Making are -

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Sdps Foundation has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Shared Decision Making - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Sdps Foundation to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Sdps Foundation can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Sdps Foundation in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Technology & Operations segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Sdps Foundation can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Sdps Foundation to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Sdps Foundation to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Sdps Foundation to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Sdps Foundation in the consumer business. Now Sdps Foundation can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Sdps Foundation to increase its market reach. Sdps Foundation will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Sdps Foundation can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Technology & Operations segment.

Buying journey improvements

– Sdps Foundation can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Shared Decision Making suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Technology & Operations industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Sdps Foundation can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Sdps Foundation can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Developing new processes and practices

– Sdps Foundation can develop new processes and procedures in Technology & Operations industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.




Threats Shared Decision Making External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Shared Decision Making are -

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Sdps Foundation can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Shared Decision Making, Sdps Foundation may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Technology & Operations .

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Sdps Foundation can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study Shared Decision Making .

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Sdps Foundation.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Sdps Foundation has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Technology & Operations industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Sdps Foundation needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Technology & Operations sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Sdps Foundation business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Environmental challenges

– Sdps Foundation needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Sdps Foundation can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Technology & Operations industry.

Increasing wage structure of Sdps Foundation

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Sdps Foundation.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Technology & Operations field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Sdps Foundation can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Sdps Foundation with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Sdps Foundation in the Technology & Operations sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Sdps Foundation demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Regulatory challenges

– Sdps Foundation needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Technology & Operations industry regulations.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Shared Decision Making Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Shared Decision Making needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Shared Decision Making is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Shared Decision Making is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Shared Decision Making is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Sdps Foundation needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Asante Teaching Hospital: Activity-Based Costing SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Melissa Jean, Courtney Young , Finance & Accounting


Dynamic View of Strategy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Constantinos C. Markides , Strategy & Execution


Penn West Petroleum Ltd. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Martin Persson, Vaughan Radcliffe, Mitchell Stein, Hammad Siddiqui , Finance & Accounting


Caffeine with a Conscience SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Andrew Wicks, Jenny Mead , Global Business


Ocean Drilling, Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Thomas R. Piper , Finance & Accounting


Kaviari: Pure Caviar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ronald G. Kamin, Eric Dolanski, Sabine Ruaud, Peter Daly , Sales & Marketing


Growing Pains at Stroz Friedberg (Abridged) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

David A. Garvin, Michael Norris , Leadership & Managing People


Nordstrom: Dissension in the Ranks? (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Robert L. Simons, Hilary A. Weston , Organizational Development


Syndexa and Technology Transfer at Harvard University SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Richard G. Hamermesh, David Kiron , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Intel in China SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Kathleen E. Slaughter, Donna Everatt, Qian Xiaojun , Organizational Development