×




Pilkington Float Glass--1955 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Pilkington Float Glass--1955


The case examines the development of the float glass process at Pilkington in the mid-1950s. Pilkington has pursued the development of a radically new process for flat glass production, but has experienced serious problems at each stage of development. The senior management must now decide whether to scale up to commercial production. A rewritten version of an earlier case.

Authors :: Kim B. Clark

Topics :: Technology & Operations

Tags :: Product development, Technology, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Pilkington Float Glass--1955" written by Kim B. Clark includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Pilkington Glass facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Pilkington Float Glass--1955 case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Product development, Technology and Technology & Operations.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Pilkington Float Glass--1955 casestudy better are - – there is increasing trade war between United States & China, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, technology disruption, supply chains are disrupted by pandemic , geopolitical disruptions, increasing transportation and logistics costs, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Pilkington Float Glass--1955


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Pilkington Float Glass--1955 case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Pilkington Glass, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Pilkington Glass operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Pilkington Float Glass--1955 can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Pilkington Float Glass--1955 case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Pilkington Glass
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Technology & Operations field.
4. Making a Technology & Operations topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Pilkington Glass




Strengths Pilkington Float Glass--1955 | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Pilkington Glass in Pilkington Float Glass--1955 Harvard Business Review case study are -

Analytics focus

– Pilkington Glass is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Kim B. Clark can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Technology & Operations industry

– Pilkington Float Glass--1955 firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Pilkington Glass to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Technology & Operations industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Pilkington Glass to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Pilkington Glass has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Pilkington Glass has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Ability to lead change in Technology & Operations field

– Pilkington Glass is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Pilkington Glass in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Pilkington Glass has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Training and development

– Pilkington Glass has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Pilkington Float Glass--1955 Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

Learning organization

- Pilkington Glass is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Pilkington Glass is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Pilkington Float Glass--1955 Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Pilkington Float Glass--1955 Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Digital Transformation in Technology & Operations segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Pilkington Glass digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Pilkington Glass has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Organizational Resilience of Pilkington Glass

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Pilkington Glass does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Low bargaining power of suppliers

– Suppliers of Pilkington Glass in the sector have low bargaining power. Pilkington Float Glass--1955 has further diversified its suppliers portfolio by building a robust supply chain across various countries. This helps Pilkington Glass to manage not only supply disruptions but also source products at highly competitive prices.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Pilkington Glass are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.






Weaknesses Pilkington Float Glass--1955 | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Pilkington Float Glass--1955 are -

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Pilkington Glass has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Lack of clear differentiation of Pilkington Glass products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Pilkington Glass needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

Products dominated business model

– Even though Pilkington Glass has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - Pilkington Float Glass--1955 should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Pilkington Glass has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

Aligning sales with marketing

– It come across in the case study Pilkington Float Glass--1955 that the firm needs to have more collaboration between its sales team and marketing team. Sales professionals in the industry have deep experience in developing customer relationships. Marketing department in the case Pilkington Float Glass--1955 can leverage the sales team experience to cultivate customer relationships as Pilkington Glass is planning to shift buying processes online.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Pilkington Glass needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Pilkington Glass has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Pilkington Float Glass--1955, it seems that the employees of Pilkington Glass don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, Kim B. Clark suggests that, Pilkington Glass is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Slow decision making process

– As mentioned earlier in the report, Pilkington Glass has a very deliberative decision making approach. This approach has resulted in prudent decisions, but it has also resulted in missing opportunities in the industry over the last five years. Pilkington Glass even though has strong showing on digital transformation primary two stages, it has struggled to capitalize the power of digital transformation in marketing efforts and new venture efforts.

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Pilkington Glass supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - Pilkington Float Glass--1955, it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Pilkington Glass vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.




Opportunities Pilkington Float Glass--1955 | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Pilkington Float Glass--1955 are -

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Pilkington Glass is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Pilkington Float Glass--1955 case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Pilkington Glass to increase its market reach. Pilkington Glass will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Pilkington Glass can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Pilkington Glass to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Pilkington Glass to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Pilkington Glass can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Loyalty marketing

– Pilkington Glass has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Pilkington Glass can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Technology & Operations industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Pilkington Glass can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Technology & Operations industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Pilkington Glass can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Pilkington Glass can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Pilkington Glass has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Pilkington Glass to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the Pilkington Float Glass--1955 case study. Pilkington Glass can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Pilkington Glass to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Buying journey improvements

– Pilkington Glass can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Pilkington Float Glass--1955 suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Pilkington Glass in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Technology & Operations segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.




Threats Pilkington Float Glass--1955 External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Pilkington Float Glass--1955 are -

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Pilkington Glass in the Technology & Operations sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Pilkington Glass in the Technology & Operations industry. The Technology & Operations industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Pilkington Glass needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Technology & Operations industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Pilkington Glass with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Pilkington Glass high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Increasing wage structure of Pilkington Glass

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Pilkington Glass.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Pilkington Glass demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Pilkington Glass can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study Pilkington Float Glass--1955 .

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Pilkington Glass.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Pilkington Glass is facing in Technology & Operations sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Regulatory challenges

– Pilkington Glass needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Technology & Operations industry regulations.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Pilkington Glass can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Pilkington Float Glass--1955 Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Pilkington Float Glass--1955 needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Pilkington Float Glass--1955 is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Pilkington Float Glass--1955 is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Pilkington Float Glass--1955 is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Pilkington Glass needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Middlesex Mushrooms Limited (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John S. Haywood-Farmer, Kara Adlington , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


An Inside Perspective on Carbon Disclosure SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Christian Blanco, Felipe Caro, Charles J. Corbett , Leadership & Managing People


Mount Rundle Hotel Banff SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Jim Kayalar , Organizational Development


Green Gold -an Innovative Sustainable Mining Scheme SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ivan Dario Lobo, Ezequiel Reficco, Ana Lucia Trujillo , Strategy & Execution


Milking Money out of Parmalat SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Josep Tapies, Francesca Toninato , Finance & Accounting


Microsoft's Go-to-market Strategy for Azure in India SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Reema Gupta, Deepa Mani, Aditya Shah, Sujata Ramachandran , Technology & Operations


Succession and Continuity for Johnson Family Enterprises (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John L. Ward, Carol Adler Zsolnay , Leadership & Managing People


PDVSA & CITGO (B): Fully Integrated? SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ashish Nanda, Leopoldo E. Lopez Mendoza , Organizational Development


P&G Canada: Old Company, New Tricks (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Brian J. Hall, Tiffany Y. Chang, Theresa Morin Hall , Leadership & Managing People