×




GiveDirectly SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of GiveDirectly


How should nonprofits design compensation systems to attract and retain talent? GiveDirectly is a respected charitable organization with an unconventional approach. Instead of spending on traditional aid programs in areas such as health care and food access in developing countries, GiveDirectly transfers cash directly to the poor. As experiments have shown this approach to be an effective and efficient way to improve recipients' life satisfaction, the organization has attracted considerable attention among donors and the media. Now, GiveDirectly is looking to grow, and it is contemplating how best to recruit talented employees and keep them motivated. In addition to offering salaries competitive with the private sector, GiveDirectly is considering linking employee compensation to organizational goals regarding the amount of cash transferred-an unusual strategy for a nonprofit.

Authors :: John Beshears, Joshua R. Schwartzstein, Tiffany Y. Chang, Brian J. Hall

Topics :: Organizational Development

Tags :: Motivating people, Social enterprise, Talent management, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "GiveDirectly" written by John Beshears, Joshua R. Schwartzstein, Tiffany Y. Chang, Brian J. Hall includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Givedirectly Compensation facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in GiveDirectly case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Motivating people, Social enterprise, Talent management and Organizational Development.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the GiveDirectly casestudy better are - – increasing commodity prices, wage bills are increasing, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, increasing energy prices, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, increasing transportation and logistics costs, supply chains are disrupted by pandemic , technology disruption, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of GiveDirectly


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in GiveDirectly case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Givedirectly Compensation, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Givedirectly Compensation operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of GiveDirectly can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in GiveDirectly case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Givedirectly Compensation
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Organizational Development field.
4. Making a Organizational Development topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Givedirectly Compensation




Strengths GiveDirectly | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Givedirectly Compensation in GiveDirectly Harvard Business Review case study are -

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Givedirectly Compensation has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study GiveDirectly - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Givedirectly Compensation has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Givedirectly Compensation has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Strong track record of project management

– Givedirectly Compensation is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Innovation driven organization

– Givedirectly Compensation is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in GiveDirectly Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Givedirectly Compensation in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

Training and development

– Givedirectly Compensation has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in GiveDirectly Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Givedirectly Compensation has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in GiveDirectly HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Digital Transformation in Organizational Development segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Givedirectly Compensation digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Givedirectly Compensation has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Ability to lead change in Organizational Development field

– Givedirectly Compensation is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Givedirectly Compensation in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the GiveDirectly Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Givedirectly Compensation are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.

High brand equity

– Givedirectly Compensation has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Givedirectly Compensation to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.






Weaknesses GiveDirectly | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of GiveDirectly are -

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Givedirectly Compensation has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

Slow decision making process

– As mentioned earlier in the report, Givedirectly Compensation has a very deliberative decision making approach. This approach has resulted in prudent decisions, but it has also resulted in missing opportunities in the industry over the last five years. Givedirectly Compensation even though has strong showing on digital transformation primary two stages, it has struggled to capitalize the power of digital transformation in marketing efforts and new venture efforts.

Lack of clear differentiation of Givedirectly Compensation products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Givedirectly Compensation needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

Products dominated business model

– Even though Givedirectly Compensation has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - GiveDirectly should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Givedirectly Compensation supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - GiveDirectly, it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Givedirectly Compensation vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As GiveDirectly HBR case study mentions - Givedirectly Compensation takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study GiveDirectly, is just above the industry average. Givedirectly Compensation needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

Aligning sales with marketing

– It come across in the case study GiveDirectly that the firm needs to have more collaboration between its sales team and marketing team. Sales professionals in the industry have deep experience in developing customer relationships. Marketing department in the case GiveDirectly can leverage the sales team experience to cultivate customer relationships as Givedirectly Compensation is planning to shift buying processes online.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Givedirectly Compensation has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Need for greater diversity

– Givedirectly Compensation has taken concrete steps on diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the efforts so far has resulted in limited success. It needs to expand the recruitment and selection process to hire more people from the minorities and underprivileged background.

High dependence on star products

– The top 2 products and services of the firm as mentioned in the GiveDirectly HBR case study still accounts for major business revenue. This dependence on star products in has resulted into insufficient focus on developing new products, even though Givedirectly Compensation has relatively successful track record of launching new products.




Opportunities GiveDirectly | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study GiveDirectly are -

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Givedirectly Compensation to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Givedirectly Compensation can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Givedirectly Compensation in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Organizational Development segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Givedirectly Compensation to increase its market reach. Givedirectly Compensation will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Givedirectly Compensation can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Organizational Development segment.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Givedirectly Compensation has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study GiveDirectly - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Givedirectly Compensation to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Givedirectly Compensation can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Givedirectly Compensation operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Organizational Development sector.

Buying journey improvements

– Givedirectly Compensation can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. GiveDirectly suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Givedirectly Compensation can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Givedirectly Compensation to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Manufacturing automation

– Givedirectly Compensation can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Organizational Development segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Givedirectly Compensation can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Developing new processes and practices

– Givedirectly Compensation can develop new processes and procedures in Organizational Development industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.




Threats GiveDirectly External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study GiveDirectly are -

Increasing wage structure of Givedirectly Compensation

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Givedirectly Compensation.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Givedirectly Compensation in the Organizational Development sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Givedirectly Compensation high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Givedirectly Compensation can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Givedirectly Compensation demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Givedirectly Compensation can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study GiveDirectly .

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Environmental challenges

– Givedirectly Compensation needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Givedirectly Compensation can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Organizational Development industry.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Givedirectly Compensation.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Givedirectly Compensation business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Givedirectly Compensation has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Organizational Development industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Givedirectly Compensation needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Organizational Development sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Organizational Development field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Givedirectly Compensation can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Regulatory challenges

– Givedirectly Compensation needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Organizational Development industry regulations.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of GiveDirectly Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study GiveDirectly needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study GiveDirectly is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study GiveDirectly is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of GiveDirectly is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Givedirectly Compensation needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Understanding and Breaking the Rules of Business: Toward a Systematic Four-Step Process SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Dodo Zu Knyphausen-Aufsess, Nils Bickhoff, Thomas Bieger , Strategy & Execution


EBX: The Rise and Fall of a Billionaire - Eike Batista SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Luiz Felipe Monteiro, Anne-Marie Carrick , Strategy & Execution


Fred Khosravi and AccessClosure SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Liz Kind, Richard G. Hamermesh , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Advertising Experiments at RestaurantGrades SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael Luca, Weijia Dai, Hyunjin Kim , Communication


Seiko Watch Corporation: Moving Upmarket SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Amir Hoosain, Mary Ho, Ali Farhoomand, Thomas M. Hout , Sales & Marketing


Glade - Nature's Scents, Spanish Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Mateo Lesizza, Jose Exprua , Sales & Marketing


J. C. Penney: The "Think Big" Strategy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Sylvie Thompson, Paul W. Farris, Ronald T Wilcox , Sales & Marketing


Transpower New Zealand: Evaluating Board Performance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Boris Groysberg, Paul M. Healy, Sarah L. Abbott , Organizational Development


www.springs.com SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

F. Warren McFarlan, Melissa Dailey , Technology & Operations


Call Center Design for Lion Financial Services SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

J. Michael Harrison, Yuval Nov , Technology & Operations