×




SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A)


In April 2010, the SEC brought fraud charges against Goldman Sachs for its structuring and marketing of Abacus 2007-AC1, a complex mortgage-related security. Less than two years after the onset of the great financial crisis, and in the midst of political posturing to shape agendas for the financial reform, the case discusses the market reaction to the lawsuit and the dilemma facing Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman's CEO. The deal structure is analyzed in detail within the context of the market for mortgage-backed securities. The case can be used in a course on financial market regulation or in a course on financial markets and institutions. Instructors may also assign a technical note "The Financial Regulatory Environment" (UVA-GEM-0103) to give students more background on the U.S. regulatory environment.

Authors :: Wei Li, Rick Green

Topics :: Global Business

Tags :: Government, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A)" written by Wei Li, Rick Green includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Sachs Sec facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Government and Global Business.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) casestudy better are - – increasing energy prices, digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, there is increasing trade war between United States & China, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, competitive advantages are harder to sustain because of technology dispersion, technology disruption, wage bills are increasing, there is backlash against globalization, increasing commodity prices, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Sachs Sec, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Sachs Sec operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Sachs Sec
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Global Business field.
4. Making a Global Business topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Sachs Sec




Strengths SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Sachs Sec in SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) Harvard Business Review case study are -

Training and development

– Sachs Sec has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

Ability to lead change in Global Business field

– Sachs Sec is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Sachs Sec in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Digital Transformation in Global Business segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Sachs Sec digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Sachs Sec has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Innovation driven organization

– Sachs Sec is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

High brand equity

– Sachs Sec has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Sachs Sec to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Ability to recruit top talent

– Sachs Sec is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Sachs Sec has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Analytics focus

– Sachs Sec is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Wei Li, Rick Green can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Learning organization

- Sachs Sec is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Sachs Sec is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Strong track record of project management

– Sachs Sec is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Sachs Sec in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Sachs Sec are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.






Weaknesses SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) are -

Aligning sales with marketing

– It come across in the case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) that the firm needs to have more collaboration between its sales team and marketing team. Sales professionals in the industry have deep experience in developing customer relationships. Marketing department in the case SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) can leverage the sales team experience to cultivate customer relationships as Sachs Sec is planning to shift buying processes online.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Sachs Sec, firm in the HBR case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A), it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Global Business strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Sachs Sec 's lucrative customers.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A), in the dynamic environment Sachs Sec has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Sachs Sec has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) HBR case study mentions - Sachs Sec takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

Need for greater diversity

– Sachs Sec has taken concrete steps on diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the efforts so far has resulted in limited success. It needs to expand the recruitment and selection process to hire more people from the minorities and underprivileged background.

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Sachs Sec is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Sachs Sec has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.

Lack of clear differentiation of Sachs Sec products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Sachs Sec needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Sachs Sec needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.




Opportunities SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) are -

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Sachs Sec can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Global Business segment.

Manufacturing automation

– Sachs Sec can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Global Business segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Sachs Sec in the consumer business. Now Sachs Sec can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Sachs Sec to increase its market reach. Sachs Sec will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Sachs Sec can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Sachs Sec operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Global Business sector.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Sachs Sec to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Sachs Sec has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Sachs Sec to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Sachs Sec to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Sachs Sec can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Sachs Sec can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Sachs Sec can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Loyalty marketing

– Sachs Sec has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Buying journey improvements

– Sachs Sec can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.




Threats SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) are -

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Sachs Sec can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) .

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Sachs Sec business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A), Sachs Sec may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Global Business .

Environmental challenges

– Sachs Sec needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Sachs Sec can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Global Business industry.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Sachs Sec has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Global Business industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Sachs Sec needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Global Business sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Global Business field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Sachs Sec can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Sachs Sec needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Global Business industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

Regulatory challenges

– Sachs Sec needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Global Business industry regulations.

Increasing wage structure of Sachs Sec

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Sachs Sec.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Sachs Sec demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Sachs Sec is facing in Global Business sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of SEC versus Goldman Sachs (A) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Sachs Sec needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Yves Saint Laurent: Strategic Leadership of Creative Directors SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Wiboon Kittilaksanawong, Leo Guilbert, Andrew Jiro Poplawski , Strategy & Execution


Shaklee Corporation: Corporate Social Responsibility SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Christopher Marquis, V. Kasturi Rangan, Alison Comings , Sales & Marketing


Earlham College Basketball: Turnaround Strategy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Juan Alcacer, Anne Marie Knott , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Investment Technology Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Clayton Rose, David Lane , Finance & Accounting


Is Your Company Ready for HR Analytics? SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Bart Baesens, Sophie De Winne, Luc Sels , Leadership & Managing People


Stella Artois in the U.K. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Paul W. Beamish, Anthony Goerzen , Sales & Marketing


Building to a Crescendo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Noam Wasserman, Vishesh Kumar , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Fabindia Overseas Pvt. Ltd. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Mukti Khaire , Innovation & Entrepreneurship