×




Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A)


Describes Priceline's patent of its "reverse auction" pricing mechanism, its discussions with Microsoft regarding Microsoft's license of the patent for its Expedia service, Microsoft's subsequent use of the technology without a license, and Priceline's decision whether to sue Microsoft for patent infringement.

Authors :: Constance E. Bagley, Michael J. Roberts

Topics :: Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Tags :: Intellectual property, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A)" written by Constance E. Bagley, Michael J. Roberts includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Priceline's Patent facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Intellectual property and Innovation & Entrepreneurship.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) casestudy better are - – there is increasing trade war between United States & China, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, wage bills are increasing, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, increasing commodity prices, digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, increasing transportation and logistics costs, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Priceline's Patent, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Priceline's Patent operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Priceline's Patent
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Innovation & Entrepreneurship field.
4. Making a Innovation & Entrepreneurship topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Priceline's Patent




Strengths Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Priceline's Patent in Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) Harvard Business Review case study are -

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Priceline's Patent has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Innovation driven organization

– Priceline's Patent is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Diverse revenue streams

– Priceline's Patent is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Digital Transformation in Innovation & Entrepreneurship segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Priceline's Patent digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Priceline's Patent has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Organizational Resilience of Priceline's Patent

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Priceline's Patent does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Learning organization

- Priceline's Patent is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Priceline's Patent is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Ability to lead change in Innovation & Entrepreneurship field

– Priceline's Patent is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Priceline's Patent in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Ability to recruit top talent

– Priceline's Patent is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Priceline's Patent in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry

– Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Priceline's Patent to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Priceline's Patent to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Analytics focus

– Priceline's Patent is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Constance E. Bagley, Michael J. Roberts can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.






Weaknesses Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) are -

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A), is just above the industry average. Priceline's Patent needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Priceline's Patent needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Priceline's Patent is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship segment. Priceline's Patent needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Priceline's Patent to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Priceline's Patent 's lucrative customers.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A), in the dynamic environment Priceline's Patent has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Priceline's Patent has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Priceline's Patent has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

Products dominated business model

– Even though Priceline's Patent has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Priceline's Patent has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Priceline's Patent, firm in the HBR case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A), it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Innovation & Entrepreneurship strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Aligning sales with marketing

– It come across in the case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) that the firm needs to have more collaboration between its sales team and marketing team. Sales professionals in the industry have deep experience in developing customer relationships. Marketing department in the case Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) can leverage the sales team experience to cultivate customer relationships as Priceline's Patent is planning to shift buying processes online.




Opportunities Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) are -

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Priceline's Patent to increase its market reach. Priceline's Patent will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Priceline's Patent to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Priceline's Patent to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Manufacturing automation

– Priceline's Patent can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Innovation & Entrepreneurship segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Priceline's Patent can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Priceline's Patent can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Loyalty marketing

– Priceline's Patent has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Priceline's Patent can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Priceline's Patent can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Priceline's Patent can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Priceline's Patent in the consumer business. Now Priceline's Patent can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Buying journey improvements

– Priceline's Patent can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Priceline's Patent can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A), to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Priceline's Patent has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Priceline's Patent to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Priceline's Patent can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Priceline's Patent operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector.




Threats Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) are -

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Environmental challenges

– Priceline's Patent needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Priceline's Patent can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry.

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Priceline's Patent in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry. The Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Priceline's Patent high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Priceline's Patent has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Priceline's Patent needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Priceline's Patent is facing in Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Regulatory challenges

– Priceline's Patent needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry regulations.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Priceline's Patent can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) .

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A), Priceline's Patent may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship .

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Priceline's Patent can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Priceline's Patent.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Priceline's Patent demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Priceline's Patent with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Priceline.com vs. Microsoft (A) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Priceline's Patent needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Whitbread Hotel Co. (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael Beer, James Weber , Organizational Development


Babeeze in Arms Doula Centre SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Matthew Thomson, Aimee Dinnin , Sales & Marketing


AVA.ph: Growing a Filipino E-Commerce Company SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

William R. Kerr, Henry Motte-Munoz , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Johnson & Johnson Company (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John F. Graham, Lisa Davidson , Leadership & Managing People


UPower Technologies Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Joseph B. Lassiter, William A. Sahlman, Liz Kind , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Wealth Management Crisis at UBS (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Paul M. Healy, George Serafeim, David Lane , Finance & Accounting


ASUSTek Computer Inc. Eee PC (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Willy Shih, Howard H. Yu, Chintay Shih, Yi-Ching Hsieh , Technology & Operations


Wider Europe: The Challenge of EU Enlargement SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Rawi Abdelal, Kimberly A. Haddad , Global Business