×




InPart SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of InPart


Stacey Lawson, HBS 1996, started a CAD parts representations database company to help designers and engineers with the design process. The company has completed its product and is starting to sell it. The case examines issues involving the organization of the sales force and the pricing of the product.

Authors :: Joseph B. Lassiter, Michael J. Roberts, Jon M. Biotti

Topics :: Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Tags :: Entrepreneurial management, Market research, Pricing, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "InPart" written by Joseph B. Lassiter, Michael J. Roberts, Jon M. Biotti includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Inpart Lawson facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in InPart case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Entrepreneurial management, Market research, Pricing and Innovation & Entrepreneurship.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the InPart casestudy better are - – customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, increasing transportation and logistics costs, geopolitical disruptions, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, cloud computing is disrupting traditional business models, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of InPart


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in InPart case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Inpart Lawson, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Inpart Lawson operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of InPart can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in InPart case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Inpart Lawson
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Innovation & Entrepreneurship field.
4. Making a Innovation & Entrepreneurship topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Inpart Lawson




Strengths InPart | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Inpart Lawson in InPart Harvard Business Review case study are -

Ability to recruit top talent

– Inpart Lawson is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the InPart are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Inpart Lawson has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in InPart HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Inpart Lawson has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Inpart Lawson has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Inpart Lawson in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

Innovation driven organization

– Inpart Lawson is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in InPart Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Organizational Resilience of Inpart Lawson

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Inpart Lawson does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry

– InPart firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Inpart Lawson to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Inpart Lawson to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Inpart Lawson has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Learning organization

- Inpart Lawson is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Inpart Lawson is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in InPart Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Strong track record of project management

– Inpart Lawson is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

High brand equity

– Inpart Lawson has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Inpart Lawson to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the InPart Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.






Weaknesses InPart | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of InPart are -

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Inpart Lawson has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study InPart, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Innovation & Entrepreneurship strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study InPart, in the dynamic environment Inpart Lawson has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Inpart Lawson has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Need for greater diversity

– Inpart Lawson has taken concrete steps on diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the efforts so far has resulted in limited success. It needs to expand the recruitment and selection process to hire more people from the minorities and underprivileged background.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Inpart Lawson is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship segment. Inpart Lawson needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Inpart Lawson to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study InPart, it seems that the employees of Inpart Lawson don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Inpart Lawson supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - InPart, it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Inpart Lawson vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.

Slow decision making process

– As mentioned earlier in the report, Inpart Lawson has a very deliberative decision making approach. This approach has resulted in prudent decisions, but it has also resulted in missing opportunities in the industry over the last five years. Inpart Lawson even though has strong showing on digital transformation primary two stages, it has struggled to capitalize the power of digital transformation in marketing efforts and new venture efforts.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, Joseph B. Lassiter, Michael J. Roberts, Jon M. Biotti suggests that, Inpart Lawson is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study InPart has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Inpart Lawson 's lucrative customers.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Inpart Lawson, firm in the HBR case study InPart needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.




Opportunities InPart | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study InPart are -

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Inpart Lawson can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, InPart, to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Inpart Lawson to increase its market reach. Inpart Lawson will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Inpart Lawson in the consumer business. Now Inpart Lawson can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Inpart Lawson to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Inpart Lawson can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Inpart Lawson can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Inpart Lawson can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Inpart Lawson is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. InPart case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Inpart Lawson has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Inpart Lawson to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the InPart case study. Inpart Lawson can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Inpart Lawson has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study InPart - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Inpart Lawson to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Inpart Lawson in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.

Manufacturing automation

– Inpart Lawson can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Innovation & Entrepreneurship segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Inpart Lawson can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.




Threats InPart External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study InPart are -

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Inpart Lawson can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study InPart .

Consumer confidence and its impact on Inpart Lawson demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Inpart Lawson has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Inpart Lawson needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study InPart, Inpart Lawson may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship .

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Inpart Lawson will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Inpart Lawson can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Inpart Lawson business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Innovation & Entrepreneurship field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Inpart Lawson can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Inpart Lawson high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Regulatory challenges

– Inpart Lawson needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry regulations.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Inpart Lawson in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Increasing wage structure of Inpart Lawson

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Inpart Lawson.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of InPart Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study InPart needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study InPart is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study InPart is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of InPart is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Inpart Lawson needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Excel Tips for Advanced Users SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Rafael de Santiago Hernando , Leadership & Managing People


Golden Rule, Video Supplement SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Andrew Wasynczuk , Leadership & Managing People


Hermes Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael L. Tushman, Daniel B. Radov , Organizational Development


Capital One Financial Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Bharat N. Anand, Michael G. Rukstad, Christopher H. Paige , Strategy & Execution


Middlesex Mushrooms Limited (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John S. Haywood-Farmer, Kara Adlington , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


National Instruments SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Lynda M. Applegate, Keri Pearlson, Natalie Kindred , Strategy & Execution


J. Perez Foods (C) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John A. Davis, Kacie Lachapelle , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Phil Charles (C) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Alexander Horniman, Charlie Flocco , Leadership & Managing People


Lyondell Chemical Company SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Stuart C. Gilson, Sarah L. Abbott , Finance & Accounting


NFC in Mongolia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Lu Jiang, Michael Frechette, Dongmei Tu, Xia Wang , Innovation & Entrepreneurship