×




Starbucks and Conservation International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Starbucks and Conservation International


This case is accompanied by a Video Short that can be shown in class or included in a digital coursepack. Instructors should consider the timing of making the video available to students, as it may reveal key case details.Starbucks, the world's leading specialty coffee company, developed a strategic alliance with Conservation International, a major international environmental nonprofit organization. The purpose of the alliance was to promote coffee-growing practices of small farms that would protect endangered habitats. The collaboration emerged from the company's corporate social responsibility policies and its coffee procurement strategy. The initial project was in the southern Mexican state of Chiapas and resulted in the incorporation of shade-grown coffee into the Starbucks product line, providing an attractive alternative market for the farmer cooperatives at a time when coffee producers were in economic crisis due to plummeting world prices. Simultaneously, the company had to deal with growing pressures from nonprofit organizations in the Fair Trade movement, demanding higher prices for farmers. Starbucks was reviewing the future of its alliance with Conservation International and its new coffee procurement guidelines aimed at promoting environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable coffee production. The nature of the industry puts the case in the global context from both the supply and demand sides.

Authors :: James E. Austin, Cate Reavis

Topics :: Leadership & Managing People

Tags :: Social responsibility, Supply chain, Sustainability, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Starbucks and Conservation International" written by James E. Austin, Cate Reavis includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Coffee Starbucks facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Starbucks and Conservation International case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Social responsibility, Supply chain, Sustainability and Leadership & Managing People.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Starbucks and Conservation International casestudy better are - – competitive advantages are harder to sustain because of technology dispersion, there is backlash against globalization, increasing energy prices, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, wage bills are increasing, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, there is increasing trade war between United States & China, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Starbucks and Conservation International


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Starbucks and Conservation International case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Coffee Starbucks, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Coffee Starbucks operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Starbucks and Conservation International can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Starbucks and Conservation International case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Coffee Starbucks
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Leadership & Managing People field.
4. Making a Leadership & Managing People topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Coffee Starbucks




Strengths Starbucks and Conservation International | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Coffee Starbucks in Starbucks and Conservation International Harvard Business Review case study are -

Diverse revenue streams

– Coffee Starbucks is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Starbucks and Conservation International case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Coffee Starbucks are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Coffee Starbucks has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Starbucks and Conservation International - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Ability to lead change in Leadership & Managing People field

– Coffee Starbucks is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Coffee Starbucks in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Training and development

– Coffee Starbucks has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Starbucks and Conservation International Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Starbucks and Conservation International Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Learning organization

- Coffee Starbucks is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Coffee Starbucks is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Starbucks and Conservation International Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Coffee Starbucks has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Starbucks and Conservation International HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Leadership & Managing People industry

– Starbucks and Conservation International firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Coffee Starbucks to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Leadership & Managing People industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Coffee Starbucks to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Organizational Resilience of Coffee Starbucks

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Coffee Starbucks does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Innovation driven organization

– Coffee Starbucks is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Starbucks and Conservation International Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Coffee Starbucks has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Coffee Starbucks has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.






Weaknesses Starbucks and Conservation International | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Starbucks and Conservation International are -

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Coffee Starbucks, firm in the HBR case study Starbucks and Conservation International needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study Starbucks and Conservation International has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Coffee Starbucks 's lucrative customers.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Starbucks and Conservation International, is just above the industry average. Coffee Starbucks needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As Starbucks and Conservation International HBR case study mentions - Coffee Starbucks takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, James E. Austin, Cate Reavis suggests that, Coffee Starbucks is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Starbucks and Conservation International, it seems that the employees of Coffee Starbucks don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Coffee Starbucks has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Products dominated business model

– Even though Coffee Starbucks has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - Starbucks and Conservation International should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Coffee Starbucks has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Coffee Starbucks has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study Starbucks and Conservation International, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Leadership & Managing People strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.




Opportunities Starbucks and Conservation International | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Starbucks and Conservation International are -

Loyalty marketing

– Coffee Starbucks has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Coffee Starbucks to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Leadership & Managing People industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Coffee Starbucks can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Coffee Starbucks can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Coffee Starbucks can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Coffee Starbucks is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Starbucks and Conservation International case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Coffee Starbucks in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Leadership & Managing People segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Coffee Starbucks can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Coffee Starbucks operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Leadership & Managing People sector.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Leadership & Managing People industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Coffee Starbucks can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Coffee Starbucks can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Coffee Starbucks to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Coffee Starbucks has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Starbucks and Conservation International - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Coffee Starbucks to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Coffee Starbucks can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Coffee Starbucks in the consumer business. Now Coffee Starbucks can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.




Threats Starbucks and Conservation International External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Starbucks and Conservation International are -

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Coffee Starbucks can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Increasing wage structure of Coffee Starbucks

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Coffee Starbucks.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Coffee Starbucks with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Leadership & Managing People field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Coffee Starbucks can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Starbucks and Conservation International, Coffee Starbucks may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Leadership & Managing People .

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Coffee Starbucks will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Coffee Starbucks high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Coffee Starbucks is facing in Leadership & Managing People sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Coffee Starbucks in the Leadership & Managing People sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Environmental challenges

– Coffee Starbucks needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Coffee Starbucks can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Leadership & Managing People industry.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Coffee Starbucks business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Starbucks and Conservation International Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Starbucks and Conservation International needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Starbucks and Conservation International is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Starbucks and Conservation International is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Starbucks and Conservation International is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Coffee Starbucks needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Privatization of Anatolia National Telekom: BOW Confidential Instructions SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael D. Watkins, Banu Ozcan, Burkhard Schrage, Paul Vaaler , Strategy & Execution


Comcast Corporation's Merger with AT&T Broadband SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

L.J. Bourgeois, Nicholas Goodman, John O. Wynne Jr. , Leadership & Managing People


Geeli, Chinese Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Li Jin, Kenneth A. Froot, May Yu , Finance & Accounting


What People Want (and How to Predict It) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Thomas H. Davenport, Jeanne G. Harris , Sales & Marketing


Progressive Insurance: Disclosure Strategy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Amy P. Hutton, James Weber , Finance & Accounting


JCDecaux, Chinese Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John R. Wells, Monika Stachowiak, Vincent Dessain , Strategy & Execution


Mahendra Bapna and Technology Education in India SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Pamela Yatsko , Technology & Operations


Methanex: Developing Strategy in a Commodity Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Daniel Shapiro, Carolyn Egri, Michael Parent, Adam J Mills , Leadership & Managing People


Chemical Fusion (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Miguel Angel Arino Martin, Frederic Sabria Miracle , Leadership & Managing People