×




Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Abhoy Ojha. The Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization (referred as “Bosch Transnational” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Organizational structure.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization Case Study


The Bosch Group is a leading global supplier of technology and services with a concentration in areas of automotive technology, industrial technology, consumer goods, and building technology. The case describes the structural changes in Bosch over its lifetime, from its founding in 1886 to the most recent changes initiated in 2007 to make it into a transnational organization. The description focuses on two types of reasons for change - one driven by the growth of the organization and the other driven by the internationalization/globalization. Until recently, Bosch's operations were structured as global geographic divisions. In 2007, the organization initiated a program to re-organize the operations as a global matrix structure. The case describes in some detail the latest changes to adopt the transnational matrix structure with emphasis on global product divisions instead of the earlier emphasis on geographic divisions outside Europe. In the second part of the case, some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged in the India operations of Bosch as a consequence of the global changes initiated by the headquarters are described. Prior to the recent changes, the companies of the Bosch Group in India operated as would any other local Indian company, with limited interface with other group companies, and little interference from headquarters. They were also doing quite well, and the managers and employees were not expecting any re-structuring. However, as part of the changes driven by global headquarters, the India operations had to undergo tremendous structural and process changes - there would be greater integration among the group companies in India, and greater integration with global product divisions. The case examines the challenges and opportunities of implementing organizational changes in a context where there is no felt need for change.


Case Authors : Abhoy Ojha

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Organizational structure




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Abhoy Ojha”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization



References & Further Readings

Abhoy Ojha (2018), "Bosch Group in India: Transition to a Transnational Organization Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Coca-Cola European SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)


Witbe Net SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Kothari Petrochemicals Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Pentamaster Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


New Cosmos Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


PetroChina ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Daemyungoration SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment