×




Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Amitava Chattopadhyay, Jean Wee, Anuj Pasrjia, Olivier Jarry. The Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India (referred as “Parivar Arogya” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Innovation, Marketing, Social enterprise, Strategy.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India Case Study


"With the publication of CK Prahalad's "The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid" (2005), the poor were suddenly seen as a potential market in the eyes of multinational corporations (MNCs). Although poor, the BOP is a large and growing market. The development community tends to focus on meeting the needs of the poorest of the poor (the 1 billion people who live on less than US$1 a day), but there is a larger segment of the low-income population, comprised of 3.8 billion people with incomes between $2 and $5 a day, that could be the focus of a market-oriented approach. They have no bank accounts, no access to modern financial services, no phones, are dependent on informal or subsistence livelihoods, and lack access to amenities and basic healthcare. Influenced by Prahalad's work, the top management at Novartis decided that it was time to seriously consider the pursuit of commercial opportunities among the world's poor. The case offers a description of the first steps to setting up the Arogya Parivar initiative by Novartis in India and raises strategic questions like how to improve its supply chain reliability, how to deal with the fact that many consumers were women and yet there were few female health educators, how to make the treatment affordable, whether to launch new brands of medicines for this segment, how to convince consumers to seek medical treatment and ensure compliance with the treatment protocol, etc., going forward. Please visit the dedicated case website http://cases.insead.edu/arogya-parivar/ (copy and paste the url into a browser) to access case videos and other support material."


Case Authors : Amitava Chattopadhyay, Jean Wee, Anuj Pasrjia, Olivier Jarry

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Innovation, Marketing, Social enterprise, Strategy




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Amitava Chattopadhyay, Jean Wee, Anuj Pasrjia, Olivier Jarry”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India



References & Further Readings

Amitava Chattopadhyay, Jean Wee, Anuj Pasrjia, Olivier Jarry (2018), "Arogya Parivar: Novartis' BOP Strategy for Healthcare in Rural India Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Scottish Mortgage SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


China Minsheng Drawin Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


BIO ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Hunan Jiudian Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Osung LST SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Koninklijke Philips ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


RIT Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Xiamen Guang Pu Electronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Toso SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Shaanxi Panlong A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs