×




Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Sarah A Soule, Davina Drabkin. The Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff (referred as “Markey Hh” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Financial management, Informal leadership, Motivating people, Organizational culture, Performance measurement, Strategy.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff Case Study


Kim Markey began as executive director of revenue cycle at Huntington Hospital (HH) in November 2012. Located in Pasadena, California, HH was a 625-bed non-profit regional medical center that was named among the top-performing hospitals in 2012 by U.S. News & World Report. To further HH's focus on high-quality, patient-centered care, Jim Noble, executive VP-COO/CFO, was looking for a change in direction, particularly in the Business Services Office. Accounts Receivable (AR), a key billing metric, could be lower and Noble hired Markey with the mandate to improve performance. Markey's long-term vision involved re-examining the revenue cycle and the hospital's processes to ensure that HH would become a stronger performer. She needed to get her metrics under control as a first step before transforming the departments she oversaw-Admitting, Business Services, Data Services, Medical Records, and Revenue Integrity-into truly patient-focused business centers. The next step would be removing barriers for patients and evolving the mindset of her departments so that HH would become known as "an organization that is going to work with you to help you understand what's going on." This case begins by detailing the environment that Markey found in the Business Services Office when she began. Because morale was low and an atmosphere of tension permeated, Markey was thoughtful and deliberate about her approach and actions as executive director. Huntington Hospital was also deep into preparations for a major software conversion, and from past experience, Markey knew that the implementation would negatively impact AR days. She needed to get the existing processes cleaned up and AR days as efficient as possible to minimize the increase that she knew was coming. To do so, she brought in two consultants. This case leaves off with a description of the initial work that the consultants did with the Medicare team and their assessment of roadblocks to moving forward. Students are asked to develop a proposal for what Markey and the consultants should do.


Case Authors : Sarah A Soule, Davina Drabkin

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Financial management, Informal leadership, Motivating people, Organizational culture, Performance measurement, Strategy




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Sarah A Soule, Davina Drabkin”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff



References & Further Readings

Sarah A Soule, Davina Drabkin (2018), "Huntington Hospital (A): Empowering Staff Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Sensient Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


AVIC International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Rana Sugars Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Freeman FinTech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Nanning Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Taihan Textile SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Banco Bpm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Polypipe Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Swedish Match SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Tobacco


Blackbaud SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Molmed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs