×




Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David Owen Kazmer. The Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium (referred as “Manufacturing Onshoring” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Operations management.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium Case Study


Manufacturing is now a national strategy for many countries to combat slow economic growth, and positively viewed with the current trend of onshoring foreign manufacturing operations. We develop a cross-country regression model that predicts manufacturing employment as a function of population growth, foreign direct investment, and purchasing power parity. Results through the year 2100 suggest that manufacturing is trending toward a global equilibrium with higher levels of manufacturing outputs but much lower levels of manufacturing employment. The reason is that countries tend to evolve from having little manufacturing to commodity manufacturing at large scale and low wages. As infrastructure and human capital develop, there is the tendency to pursue advanced manufacturing in support of higher valued goods. The manufacture of commodity products is then outsourced to those countries with lower costs justified by their less-developed infrastructure and human capital, and so the virtuous cycle continues. While this model suggests that current efforts in revitalization of domestic manufacturing would lead to an increase in wealth in the United States, the bad news is that these gains are unlikely to be sustainable in the long term. However, the good news is that manufacturing acts as a rising tide that raises all nations and our global quality of life.


Case Authors : David Owen Kazmer

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Operations management




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “David Owen Kazmer”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium



References & Further Readings

David Owen Kazmer (2018), "Manufacturing Outsourcing, Onshoring, and Global Equilibrium Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Taiyuan Heavy Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Absa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Kamdhenu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Kikukawa Enterprise SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Brookfield Property A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Unisem M SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Centric Brands SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Link Reservations SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Nippo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Beijing Huaye Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services