×




Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Greg Fisher, Michael Goldman. The Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event (referred as “Event Festivals” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event Case Study


The founder and CEO of a mountain bike race in South Africa wonders how to build on the world-class event that he and his team have created. Although the event is popular and continues to grow in prestige, the business's dependence on a single event creates both a threat and an opportunity. The threat is that the business would be in serious jeopardy if something were to go wrong with the event. The opportunity is that the event can be a launch pad for additional events or for other business concepts. Although the team has experimented with some ideas, they have not hit on anything that they want to pursue on an ongoing basis. The founder and CEO is therefore looking for the concept or idea that will provide the business with its next injection of growth. Learnings from the case may be applied to any event-based creative industries business, such as music festivals, exhibitions, fairs or film festivals. Author Greg Fisher is affiliated with Indiana University and Michael Goldman is affiliated with University of Pretoria.


Case Authors : Greg Fisher, Michael Goldman

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004906) -10004906 - -
Year 1 3463275 -6541631 3463275 0.9434 3267241
Year 2 3969272 -2572359 7432547 0.89 3532638
Year 3 3974587 1402228 11407134 0.8396 3337140
Year 4 3243942 4646170 14651076 0.7921 2569506
TOTAL 14651076 12706524




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2701618

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Event Festivals have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Event Festivals shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Event Festivals often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Event Festivals needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004906) -10004906 - -
Year 1 3463275 -6541631 3463275 0.8696 3011543
Year 2 3969272 -2572359 7432547 0.7561 3001340
Year 3 3974587 1402228 11407134 0.6575 2613355
Year 4 3243942 4646170 14651076 0.5718 1854734
TOTAL 10480973


The Net NPV after 4 years is 476067

(10480973 - 10004906 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004906) -10004906 - -
Year 1 3463275 -6541631 3463275 0.8333 2886063
Year 2 3969272 -2572359 7432547 0.6944 2756439
Year 3 3974587 1402228 11407134 0.5787 2300108
Year 4 3243942 4646170 14651076 0.4823 1564401
TOTAL 9507011


The Net NPV after 4 years is -497895

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9507011 - 10004906 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Event Festivals to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Event Festivals has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Event Festivals can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Event Festivals, then the stock price of the Event Festivals should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Event Festivals should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event

References & Further Readings

Greg Fisher, Michael Goldman (2018), "Beyond Epic: Building the Business Beyond a Single Event Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


ZTE Corp-H SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


First Winner Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Cesar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


TBCSCAT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Digiwin Software SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


COSCO Pacific SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Parkd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services