×




Robin Ash and Printzhof Press Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Robin Ash and Printzhof Press case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Robin Ash and Printzhof Press case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Frank V. Cespedes, Lynda St. Clair. The Robin Ash and Printzhof Press (referred as “Printzhof Ash” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Communication, Competitive strategy, Conflict, Human resource management, Motivating people, Organizational culture, Strategic planning, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Robin Ash and Printzhof Press Case Study


Robin Ash has just been promoted to Chief Operating Officer of Printzhof Press and Vice President of its parent company, Education and Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Her first objective is to create an action plan that will achieve two seemingly contradictory corporate objectives: transform Printzhof into an aggressively competitive 21st century educational publisher while maintaining its close-knit and collaborative culture. Because of new technologies changing how information is delivered and used in higher education, the need for the company to evolve along with the publishing industry is obvious to Ash and other company leaders. However, Printzhof's history of success has resulted in resistance to organizational change among many longtime employees and senior managers. Still, Ash must revitalize Printzhof without destroying employee morale and loyalty. How far and how fast should she move on the critical priorities she has identified?


Case Authors : Frank V. Cespedes, Lynda St. Clair

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Communication, Competitive strategy, Conflict, Human resource management, Motivating people, Organizational culture, Strategic planning, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Robin Ash and Printzhof Press Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019054) -10019054 - -
Year 1 3450937 -6568117 3450937 0.9434 3255601
Year 2 3959571 -2608546 7410508 0.89 3524004
Year 3 3950249 1341703 11360757 0.8396 3316705
Year 4 3251177 4592880 14611934 0.7921 2575237
TOTAL 14611934 12671547




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2652493

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Printzhof Ash have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Printzhof Ash shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Robin Ash and Printzhof Press

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Printzhof Ash often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Printzhof Ash needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019054) -10019054 - -
Year 1 3450937 -6568117 3450937 0.8696 3000815
Year 2 3959571 -2608546 7410508 0.7561 2994005
Year 3 3950249 1341703 11360757 0.6575 2597353
Year 4 3251177 4592880 14611934 0.5718 1858871
TOTAL 10451043


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431989

(10451043 - 10019054 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019054) -10019054 - -
Year 1 3450937 -6568117 3450937 0.8333 2875781
Year 2 3959571 -2608546 7410508 0.6944 2749702
Year 3 3950249 1341703 11360757 0.5787 2286024
Year 4 3251177 4592880 14611934 0.4823 1567890
TOTAL 9479397


The Net NPV after 4 years is -539657

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9479397 - 10019054 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Printzhof Ash to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Printzhof Ash has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Printzhof Ash can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Printzhof Ash, then the stock price of the Printzhof Ash should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Printzhof Ash should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Robin Ash and Printzhof Press

References & Further Readings

Frank V. Cespedes, Lynda St. Clair (2018), "Robin Ash and Printzhof Press Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Video River Networks SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Kingsignal Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Land Business SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Safran SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Triumph SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Shanghai Sk A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Kwan On SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Yomiuri Land Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Hiscox SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


NTN Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products