×




National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael Sider, Jeremy Yip, Phil Ward, Steve Dempsey. The National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement (referred as “Nhl Bargaining” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Communication. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Compensation, Customers, Labor, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement Case Study


The National Hockey League's (NHL's) collective bargaining agreement was due to expire on September 15, 2004. As executive director of the NHL Players' Association, it is Bob Goodenow's responsibility to negotiate a new agreement in the players' best interests. The NHL has demanded that a salary cap be imposed in the next collective bargaining agreement and has threatened a lockout by owners if the Players' Association does not agree. The NHL has implemented a successful communications strategy and gained public support. Goodenow must decide how to proceed to gain a favorable position going into the negotiations and retain the loyalty of the fans on which the sport depends.


Case Authors : Michael Sider, Jeremy Yip, Phil Ward, Steve Dempsey

Topic : Communication

Related Areas : Compensation, Customers, Labor, Negotiations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022020) -10022020 - -
Year 1 3445409 -6576611 3445409 0.9434 3250386
Year 2 3957844 -2618767 7403253 0.89 3522467
Year 3 3944447 1325680 11347700 0.8396 3311834
Year 4 3246700 4572380 14594400 0.7921 2571690
TOTAL 14594400 12656377




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2634357

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nhl Bargaining have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nhl Bargaining shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Communication Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nhl Bargaining often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nhl Bargaining needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022020) -10022020 - -
Year 1 3445409 -6576611 3445409 0.8696 2996008
Year 2 3957844 -2618767 7403253 0.7561 2992699
Year 3 3944447 1325680 11347700 0.6575 2593538
Year 4 3246700 4572380 14594400 0.5718 1856311
TOTAL 10438556


The Net NPV after 4 years is 416536

(10438556 - 10022020 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022020) -10022020 - -
Year 1 3445409 -6576611 3445409 0.8333 2871174
Year 2 3957844 -2618767 7403253 0.6944 2748503
Year 3 3944447 1325680 11347700 0.5787 2282666
Year 4 3246700 4572380 14594400 0.4823 1565731
TOTAL 9468074


The Net NPV after 4 years is -553946

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9468074 - 10022020 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nhl Bargaining to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nhl Bargaining has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nhl Bargaining can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nhl Bargaining, then the stock price of the Nhl Bargaining should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nhl Bargaining should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement

References & Further Readings

Michael Sider, Jeremy Yip, Phil Ward, Steve Dempsey (2018), "National Hockey League Collective Bargaining Agreement Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Samick Thk SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


NutryFarm Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Moog B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Nippon Chemi-Con Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Amara Raja Batteries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


HK & China Gas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Etalon Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Advance Nanotek SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Ellipsiz Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


SeaWorld Entertainment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities